Square riggers at Charlestown
Uploaded: April 27, 2013
1/200sec; f9; ISO 125; 16mm fl
Exif: F Number: 9, Exposure Bias Value: 0.00, ExposureTime: 1/200 seconds, Flash: did not fire, compulsory flash mode, ISO: 125, White balance: Manual white balance, FocalLength: 14.00 mm, Model: Canon EOS 50D
Michael Kelly April 27, 2013
Interesting shot Peter - did you use a filter of some sort as the WB is way off. This may be intentional but if it is, it is a bit strong for my taste. #1525856Dale Hardin April 27, 2013
There is so much to like about this image Peter. The composition is great and the leading line of the water way re-enforces that. The sky is very interesting and the balance of sky to subject works really well.The filtering does add warmth to the shot, but agree with Mike that it is a bit strong. I'd suggest about 1/3 to 1/2 the effect and masking the sky so it has less, would work beautifully. #10669965
Stephen Shoff April 27, 2013
that is very nice picture, Peter. I agree with the white balance comments above.For myself, I would have straightened the verticals. #10670002
Peter W. Marks April 28, 2013
Thank you gentlemen.Stephen Shoff April 28, 2013
Yes, Peter, the central mainmast is vertical. It was the peripheral verticals I was referring to and the typical tilts that result from using wide angle lenses. This wasn't a "level horizon" type of comment.If you want to keep all your post-processing in ACR, just yesterday I found the tools for straightening images in ACR. They are under the Lens Corrections tool and the Manual tab. These ACR tools may only be available in the version of ACR that comes with the CSx Photoshop. I don't know if they are available in the Elements distribution.
If you want an "old masters" effect, then I would think you also need to add some kind of texture to simulate a painting. I haven't found what texture that is, though. #10670351
Beth Spencer April 28, 2013
This is a very interesting picture of the ship. I agree the white balance is a off for me. I can't imagine how they fit that ship in the small canal without wrecking it. #10671811Kalena Randall April 28, 2013
Peter, I like the composition of your photo very much. I can see where you were trying to go with this and I like your idea. I do agree with Stephen that a bit of the texture would give you your painting look. I do know that there are some textures in PSE, but I'm not entirely sure if what you need is there. :-) #10671824Jeff E Jensen April 29, 2013
Holy smokes, Peter's getting all fancy on us! It's nice to see you trying some things out, Pete. #10674183Arthur Bohlmann April 29, 2013
I really like this capture but would like to see it lightened up a little. #10674346Peter W. Marks April 29, 2013
Thank you kindly friends. I haven't enough time to try everything you suggested but here is one on which I have straightened using PSE 'Correct camera distortion'; cropped it to lose the wall on the right; used the Elements filter effects to give a 'canvas texture' and brightened it slightly with levels. Then I used the Elements: filters>texture>texturizer>; selected canvas and played with the sliders. Adjusted levels just a bit to lighten things up as requested. #10674475Peter W. Marks April 29, 2013
Oops! Forgot the important bit. here is the altered version.Arthur Bohlmann April 29, 2013
You get a thumbs up from me Peter. #10674702Beth Spencer April 29, 2013
Looks great!! #10674788Dale Hardin April 29, 2013
Nicely done old friend. #10674943Peter W. Marks April 30, 2013
The original image converted from RAW but not altered in PSEDale Hardin April 30, 2013
Like the original too. Would love to see that place in person. #10676366Jeff E Jensen April 30, 2013
Pete, I like the original, but I like your re-work even more. Nice work, my friend! #10677288Peter W. Marks May 01, 2013
And a further thank you to Beth, Art. Dale and Jeff.lisa anderson May 01, 2013
Peter, I love the original post and think it totally deserves the EP. I also love the way the blue line on the boat pops in the original photo. (Are you sure you want the queen back, though? Move to Canada and get the best of both worlds) #10677628Michael Kelly May 01, 2013
I like the edit and think you did a great job. The original unedited version is one of the best photos I can remember you posting. I think it might be worth doing some standard edits to tune it up and enter it too. The one thing I would strongly recommend is to clone out the rubber boat as for me it ruins the old time feel of the shot. #10677987Peter W. Marks May 01, 2013
Thank you Lisa. Of course who I really wanted was Maggie Thatcher our old prime minister but she has just popped her clogs.Rita K. Connell May 02, 2013
this is really a very cool shot Pete, and I really like the affect that you gave it, you made me take a step back in time. great job...but I wish I hadn't read the tread. because you spoiled it...with bringing my attention to the inflatable boat and Johnson outboard motor. ...now I am back in real time....LOL #10678946Peter W. Marks May 02, 2013
Ah Rita, we have to blame Mike for pointing out the inflatable boat. I think it was my grannie that used to say 'Peter William, you never learn to leave well alone! But I really did think I could fix that old clock that used to lose a few minutes a day!Elaine Hessler May 03, 2013
Sorry for the late post, but I think your textured picture would look great printed on some type of textured canvas. They may have canvas with paint brush strokes in it, so you may be able to remove the texture so you don't overdo it. It does look old and when I first looked at it, I thought it was a picture of a picture! Very nice job Peter.#10680728
Stephen Shoff May 03, 2013
I'm up for it, Peter. Fares are cheaper before May 1 and after Sept. 1. Seems like you should be able to fly direct from Chicago.I don't agree with Mike. I think a few of your Cornwall harbor pictures would be hard to beat. And you did do minimalist picture of a speaking platform a couple of years ago. This one is great but does suffer from just a couple of distractions. #10681091
Beth Spencer May 04, 2013
Congratulations on your EP!!! They are few and far between lately so way to go!! #10682046Debbie E. Payne May 07, 2013
I such love your first post, Peter. It has such richness and drama to it in addition to a great composition. Are you going to get all artsy on us now? Both are deserving images but I think the tones win out for me. Which one does Elizabeth like best? #10685518Sign up for an interactive online photography course to get critiques on your photos.
Discussions by Category: You can view photo discussions on various themes in the Community > Photo Discussions section of the site.
BetterPhoto Websites: If you see an orange website link directly under the photographer's name, it's totally okay. It's not spam. The reason: BetterPhoto is the one that offers these personal photography websites. We are supporting our clients with those links.
Unavailable EXIF: If there is no other information but 'Unavailable' in the EXIF (meaning no EXIF data exists with the photo), the 'Unavailable' blurb is not displayed. If there is any info, it shows. Many photos have the EXIF stripped out when people modify the image and resave it, before uploading.
The following truth is one of the core philosophies of BetterPhoto:
I hear, I forget.
I see, I remember.
I do, I understand.
You learn by doing. Take your next online photography class.
Copyright for this photo belongs solely to Peter W. Marks.
Images may not be copied, downloaded, or used in any way without the expressed, written permission of the photographer.
Log in to follow or message this photographer or report this photo.
I already have an account!