Bud

Uploaded: May 11, 2009

Description

1/640 sec, f 6.3, ISO 400

Exif: F Number: 6.3, Exposure Bias Value: 0.00, ExposureTime: 1/640 seconds, Flash: did not fire, compulsory flash mode, ISO: 400, White balance: Auto white balance, FocalLength: 66.00 mm, Model: Canon EOS 40D

Comments

Dawn M. Schneider May 11, 2009

very nice, I like the dof, lighting and composition. not sure about the bottom left as it is distrating me from the new bulb? lovely color. #1126469

Mary A. Legler May 11, 2009

Thanks for the suggestion, Dawn. I tried it. I think it made an improvement. Wish I did this before I entered it in the contest. Thanks again. I really appreciate suggestions! #7510786

Jean Lechleiter level-classic May 11, 2009

Mary, The second image is definitely less cluttered. Clarity, lighting and DOF are great. #7510897

Christie R. Bielss May 12, 2009

Well now, I'm going to be the odd man out. I like the first crop. I like how you got just enough of the yellow flower in there to make an impact. The 2nd crop takes too much of the yellow flower out. I think cloning that bud in the back would've been better. And if you don't get an EP or move on, then re-enter it next month. Absolutely love the lighting on this. Such a beautiful glow. Very nice dof and composition as well. #7511696

Dawn M. Schneider May 12, 2009

well im going to agree with christie, I love the 1st crop, try just cloning out the bottom left and see what happens. the 1st image is more stunning with the other flowers. dont get me wrong though, I like the 2nd one too. Enter them both and see what they like!!! #7511795

Mary A. Legler May 13, 2009

I really learned a lot from this. I originally kept the bottom left flower in because I thought it would draw the viewers eye around the image. I could see what Dawn and Jean meant about it being distracting, cluttered. Then, Christie's comment about losing the other yellow flower's impact after re-cropping, got me thinking again. Sooooooo, here is my third try. LOL. I am going to re-enter one of them next month. Thank you all so much for you input. Very much appreciated! #7516003

To discuss, first log in or sign up (buttons are at top center of page).

Get Constructive Critiques

Sign up for an interactive online photography course to get critiques on your photos.


 

Did You Know?

Discussions by Category: You can view photo discussions on various themes in the Community > Photo Discussions section of the site.

BetterPhoto Websites: If you see an orange website link directly under the photographer's name, it's totally okay. It's not spam. The reason: BetterPhoto is the one that offers these personal photography websites. We are supporting our clients with those links.

Unavailable EXIF: If there is no other information but 'Unavailable' in the EXIF (meaning no EXIF data exists with the photo), the 'Unavailable' blurb is not displayed. If there is any info, it shows. Many photos have the EXIF stripped out when people modify the image and resave it, before uploading.


 

The following truth is one of the core philosophies of BetterPhoto:

I hear, I forget.
I see, I remember.
I do, I understand.

You learn by doing. Take your next online photography class.


Copyright for this gallery photo belongs solely to Mary A. Legler.
Images may not be copied, downloaded, or used in any way without the expressed, written permission of the photographer.
Log in to follow or message this photographer or report this photo.