The Beach-St Ives
Uploaded: March 08, 2014
Exif: F Number: 9, Exposure Bias Value: 0.67, ExposureTime: 1/80 seconds, Flash: did not fire, compulsory flash mode, ISO: 500, White balance: Manual white balance, FocalLength: 20.00 mm, Model: Canon EOS 50D
Peter W. Marks March 08, 2014
Any suggestions about the decapitated guy on the right? I could clone him out but that would leave that area a bit uninteresting. #1566161Debbie E. Payne March 09, 2014
You could clone him out and bring in a picture of yourself. Then you could place yourself more at the lower right hand sweet spot. Like the frame within the frame, Peter. #10996368Rita K. Connell March 09, 2014
I am with Debbie on her suggestion #10996376Peter W. Marks March 09, 2014
You really don't want to see me in a Speedo do you girls? lolKalena Randall March 09, 2014
I like photos like this! They are interesting and a frame within a frame. In this case, many frames!As far as the decapitation - hmmmm- not sure! #10996460
Dale Hardin March 09, 2014
I like this a lot, Peter. The framing works perfectly and the unique POV gives the view a sense of belonging to the scene and the ability to simply go downstairs and join the crowd.The "headless" guy is a non-issue and can either be cloned out, or since the resolution is low, simply raise him up a bit and add in the areas for his shoulders.
One thing that would help the image would be to straighten it using the center vertical post of the window as a point of reference. #10996485
Jeff E Jensen March 09, 2014
I like this, Peter. You've gotten some good suggestions, can't wait to see what you come up with. #10996506Peter W. Marks March 09, 2014
Thank you so much friends. I gave taken all your ideas on board (except I forgot the darned window Dale) but was then inspired to go in a slightly different direct using a composite of a self-portrait from a few years ago.Elaine Hessler March 09, 2014
Those are both nice shots! The person on the right doesn't bother me at all-I find myself looking at the person to the left of him-I didn't notice at first what you were talking about.And your edit is really fun-looks like you spent some time on it! Nice job. #10996531
Debbie E. Payne March 09, 2014
Love your edit ,Peter. You matched the light nicely and it doesn't look like a composite. #10996579Dale Hardin March 09, 2014
Good idea with the edit, Peter. But I think it would work better if you left the background as it was instead of blurring it so much. It might have worked if you blurred only the out side view, but that much blur on the inside, so close to you, gives the composite away. #10996599Stephen Shoff March 09, 2014
You know, Peter, that window sill ought to have a flower vase on it, although that may not work since it look lie its a flat sill.I like wide-angle distorted shots like this and have done them on purpose. One of my favorite picture from Rome a few years ago was taken with my ultra-wide angle lens right at the corner of a Vatican museum window looking out at the dome of St. Peter's Basilica.
Good job. #10996685
Stephen Shoff March 10, 2014
...since it looks like it may not be a level sill. #10997317Beth Spencer March 11, 2014
Peter I really like it so much better with you in it!! Great job on the edit! #10998163Peter W. Marks March 11, 2014
Thank you kindly friends. It will sound a bit, whatever the word is, but I like this edited one too. Usually I can't be bothered to mess around with my images but with this I had a vision of what I wanted to achieve and felt I had got close.Michael Kelly March 12, 2014
I think the original works fine. Because of the multiple lights in the window I don’t think there is a problem with the cut off figures. Just straiten and I think you have a good shoot.The self portrait works well except for the inside wall and window blur. I am with Dale on this. It is very easy though to just blur the outside scene which will make this into a great composite.
#10998728
Peter W. Marks March 12, 2014
Hi Mike. I understand where you and Dale are coming from about the blur, it is just that to make the scene, the window and the sill sharp loses the intent of my 'Memory'. The reason for me choosing an image of me looking sideways rather then out of the window is that what I was attempting to portray was a person (me) just remembering when I was in that room a year or two ago even as I sit here 4000 miles away from my beloved Cornwall. Does that make sense?Dale Hardin March 12, 2014
Peter, it does make sense and I understood your reasoning. It's just that so doing flaunts the obvious, "this is a composite" and you could have achieved your goal while still making it appear as an out of camera image.The suggestion was for photographic reasons and not creative critique. :-] #10998888
Sign up for an interactive online photography course to get critiques on your photos.
Discussions by Category: You can view photo discussions on various themes in the Community > Photo Discussions section of the site.
BetterPhoto Websites: If you see an orange website link directly under the photographer's name, it's totally okay. It's not spam. The reason: BetterPhoto is the one that offers these personal photography websites. We are supporting our clients with those links.
Unavailable EXIF: If there is no other information but 'Unavailable' in the EXIF (meaning no EXIF data exists with the photo), the 'Unavailable' blurb is not displayed. If there is any info, it shows. Many photos have the EXIF stripped out when people modify the image and resave it, before uploading.
The following truth is one of the core philosophies of BetterPhoto:
I hear, I forget.
I see, I remember.
I do, I understand.
You learn by doing. Take your next online photography class.
Copyright for this photo belongs solely to Peter W. Marks.
Images may not be copied, downloaded, or used in any way without the expressed, written permission of the photographer.
Log in to follow or message this photographer or report this photo.
I already have an account!