art musuem in chicago
Uploaded: March 03, 2011
Exif: F Number: 5, Exposure Bias Value: -0.33, ExposureTime: 1/60 seconds, Flash: did not fire., ISO: 3200, White balance: Auto white balance, FocalLength: 70.00 mm, Model: NIKON D300
Anthony L. Mancuso March 03, 2011
I love the directional light on the lion's head here Rita, I think it creates a lot of drama with the different light and shadowed areas. I am not crazy about the compositional placement of the tall building. I think it would work better if it were more to the left with space between it and the lion. That being said, I think I would blacken either the entire bg, or black out the big building and leave the shorter building in to retain the city atmosphere of the image. #1357736Rita K. Connell March 03, 2011
I see what you mean I don't have time today to work on it today but I will tommorrow here is two more pov tell me what you think #9271975Aimee C. Eisaman March 03, 2011
Love the lighting in this shot! I'm such a fan of night time city shots, but have never taken one. I see what Tony is saying although it wasn't a deal breaker for me. You could always select the tall building and copy paste it to another area. Then clone over it on the lower layer from the surrounding sky. :~)This photo makes me think of my grandfather. when I was growing up....heck up until the day he died he had a concrete lion about 3 feet tall sitting at the end of the porch. He always said he was going to paint it, but never did. Was always proud of it and would make sure anyone that came over took note of it! Ah thanks for the memories! :~) #9272094
Anthony L. Mancuso March 03, 2011
I like the new posts Rita. I prefer the new vertical one because I think the bg banners in the horizontal post draw attention away from the lion and buildings. #9272179Beth Spencer March 03, 2011
I think he is an a regal looking lion. I like the first picture but wonder it would look like if the background was blurred some? #9272447Debbie E. Payne March 03, 2011
Rita - I love to see your low light images. It is a type of photography I really haven't practiced much, but should now that I have a camera that can handle a lot of noise. I would like to see what the original looks like with the building closest to the lion painted out. Of your others, Iike the vertical one best. #9272588Stephen Shoff March 04, 2011
I like these night-time cityscapes, too. I tried a few, but haven't quite come to terms with all the discordant lighting patterns. I'll be interested to see Tony's suggestion. #9273685Carla Capra Anderson March 04, 2011
Hi Rita;Rita K. Connell March 05, 2011
thank you everyone I love night shots but I do find them very challenging for sure.I have attached three shots
one with all the building gone
two with the building blurred
three with the tall building gone
#9274726
Susan M. Reynolds March 05, 2011
It's hard to pick a favorite. Your lighting on all of them is exquiste, Rita...I agree that the tall building in the first one competes with the regal beauty of the lions head, but you've not only fixed that but tried several other options and shown us different POV as well.Michael Kelly March 05, 2011
I like the original the best but with the BG blur. Beautiful lighting and very dramatic. The blur keeps the city in the shot but greatly reduces the distraction. Great night shot! Wonderful color. #9274836Aimee C. Eisaman March 05, 2011
You're gonna think I'm crazy, but I like the original post the best. I feel there is enough DOF blur to the background and the dramatic lighting really draws me into the main subject. The added blur on your more recent post seems to have caught the edges of the lion and it just doesn't have the same pop for me. I do think it's awesome that you have showed so many options. Way to work the shot! :~) #9275454Carla Capra Anderson March 06, 2011
Hi Rita;Peter W. Marks March 06, 2011
I too am with Aimee and carla in preferring your original or the same comp with a bit of blur. I would be interested to know what camera settings you used. #9276842Dale Hardin March 06, 2011
Rita, you've done a marvelous job with your low light imagery. Something I hope to emulate.Not a lot to add except to add my favorites to the list. I agree that the first image works just fine with the blacked out version my second choice. I think the blacked out version would by my first choice if a gradient blend were used instead of just black. #9276888
Rita K. Connell March 07, 2011
Aimee you are not crazy I need to redo the blurred onedale I am not sure I know how to do a gradient blend could you give me some instruction please. #9277552
Beth Spencer March 07, 2011
You have done a lot of work on all of these! They all look good, but I like the blurred one best, then the blacked out background. Great work! #9278404Sign up for an interactive online photography course to get critiques on your photos.
Discussions by Category: You can view photo discussions on various themes in the Community > Photo Discussions section of the site.
BetterPhoto Websites: If you see an orange website link directly under the photographer's name, it's totally okay. It's not spam. The reason: BetterPhoto is the one that offers these personal photography websites. We are supporting our clients with those links.
Unavailable EXIF: If there is no other information but 'Unavailable' in the EXIF (meaning no EXIF data exists with the photo), the 'Unavailable' blurb is not displayed. If there is any info, it shows. Many photos have the EXIF stripped out when people modify the image and resave it, before uploading.
The following truth is one of the core philosophies of BetterPhoto:
I hear, I forget.
I see, I remember.
I do, I understand.
You learn by doing. Take your next online photography class.
Copyright for this photo belongs solely to Rita K. Connell.
Images may not be copied, downloaded, or used in any way without the expressed, written permission of the photographer.
Contact photographer via gallery
Log in to follow or message this photographer or report this photo.
I already have an account!