python
Uploaded: January 04, 2011
this was taken through glass at the columbus ohio zoo
Exif: F Number: 5.6, Exposure Bias Value: 0.33, ExposureTime: 1/30 seconds, Flash: did not fire., ISO: 3200, White balance: Manual white balance, FocalLength: 112.00 mm, Model: NIKON D300
Dale Hardin January 04, 2011
Rita, this one is a beauty!! Very menacing and perfectly camouflaged. His head is almost invisible in front of his body.You could still keep that look while bringing out his head a bit more. Try duplicating the image and apply about 50% multiply blend. Then erase the effect from the head only and apply high pass filter to the head only as well.
Have to assume this is a zoo capture 'cause I can't see you getting that close in the wild. LOL
#1341364
Teresa H. Hunt January 04, 2011
Oh wow! That is way to close for me . . . even if it was through glass.I think this shot is great just the way it is. His eye is in perfect focus and the DOF is great.
I'm curious to see Dale's suggestions . . . #9143507
Aimee C. Eisaman January 05, 2011
Rita awesome shot thru glass. This isn't something you could get without a really nice telephoto otherwise. I really like the DOF and the comp. is nice as well. Will be curious to see Dales suggestions. This would also look neat as a pano if you are interested! :~) #9143975Carla Capra Anderson January 05, 2011
Wow, Rita this is wonderful.Anthony L. Mancuso January 05, 2011
Great focus and DOF Rita...I am joining the "curious to see Dale's suggestions" club too...I think that could actually be a spinoff club from the phellos since we all say that after every critique he writes! #9144217Joan E. Hoffman January 05, 2011
ROFL @ Tony's suggestion of a spin off club! However, I think we want to keep Dale all to ourselves!!Rita... one one the neatest snake shots I have ever seen! Wonderfully done! I actually really like snakes... (as long as they are safely behind glass!!!!!) #9144884
Rita K. Connell January 05, 2011
reptile house is always fun to go into at the zoo. and Dale you are so right at not getting this close. This beauty was really close to the glass with my suction cup on the end of my lens ( after wiping the window off of course) he just laid their keeping and eye on me.Rita K. Connell January 05, 2011
carla I sorry I forgot to say what lens I used my nikon 18 to 200mm on this one I usually take that one and my 300mm with me to the zoo. that usually covers all my wants. #9144905Dale Hardin January 05, 2011
LOL. Rita, I think I like your version better than mine. A bit dark even though the head is the same. Hmmm. #9145063Joan E. Hoffman January 05, 2011
18 to 200 .... I am totally envious... I ALWAYS have the wrong lens for the occasion. I want an 18 to 12 million zillion LOL #9145083Joan E. Hoffman January 05, 2011
18 to 200 .... I am totally envious... I ALWAYS have the wrong lens for the occasion. I want an 18 to 12 million zillion LOL #9145084Joan E. Hoffman January 05, 2011
How in heck did I do that one twice #9145087Debbie E. Payne January 05, 2011
Joan - I am SO GLAD to know that I am in good company because that is a mistake that I make occasionally. Generally, at night when I am tired...And Rita - I think I like your original best. Shooting through glass is a real challenge for me. He is very cool. #9145122
Beth Spencer January 05, 2011
I have to agree that this is way too close for me but an awesome shot!!Teresa H. Hunt January 05, 2011
I love what the edits did! I think I favor the original crop over the pano one. :) #9145436Aimee C. Eisaman January 06, 2011
Thanks for try my crop idea, but I too like the original one best! :~) Also like the original over Dales suggestions. #9146064Carla Capra Anderson January 06, 2011
Hi Rita,Brenda K. Beatty January 06, 2011
I NEVER want to get this close to a snake (even in a photo) but I have to agree I like the original Best. #9146163Rita K. Connell January 06, 2011
thanks so much everyone I will enter the original today. #9146332Dale Hardin January 06, 2011
:D) Good choice Rita. :o) #9146605Sign up for an interactive online photography course to get critiques on your photos.
Discussions by Category: You can view photo discussions on various themes in the Community > Photo Discussions section of the site.
BetterPhoto Websites: If you see an orange website link directly under the photographer's name, it's totally okay. It's not spam. The reason: BetterPhoto is the one that offers these personal photography websites. We are supporting our clients with those links.
Unavailable EXIF: If there is no other information but 'Unavailable' in the EXIF (meaning no EXIF data exists with the photo), the 'Unavailable' blurb is not displayed. If there is any info, it shows. Many photos have the EXIF stripped out when people modify the image and resave it, before uploading.
The following truth is one of the core philosophies of BetterPhoto:
I hear, I forget.
I see, I remember.
I do, I understand.
You learn by doing. Take your next online photography class.
Copyright for this photo belongs solely to Rita K. Connell.
Images may not be copied, downloaded, or used in any way without the expressed, written permission of the photographer.
Contact photographer via gallery
Log in to follow or message this photographer or report this photo.
I already have an account!