Uploaded: January 26, 2012 13:38:23
1/400 f5.6 ISO 500 400mm
Exif: F Number: 5.6, Exposure Bias Value: 0.00, ExposureTime: 1/400 seconds, Flash: did not fire, compulsory flash mode, ISO: 500, White balance: Auto white balance, FocalLength: 400.00 mm, Model: Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Michael Kelly January 26, 2012
I would be grateful if any of you could identify this hawk definitively. It is either a Cooper's or a Sharp-Shined. They are very similar looking hawks and it is very difficult to tell the difference between them. This one is at our house, where we see him, at least once a month. We often find the results of his meals in the yard. His favorite food seems to be quayle, but I believe he gets doves on occasion too.Here uis another view. #1439339
Stephen Shoff January 26, 2012
looks like Cooper's Hawk to me. chest pattern of adult. short legs. round tail. Your fron picture clearly shows unequal length tail feathershttp://www.birds.cornell.edu/pfw/AboutBirdsandFeeding/accipiterIDtable.htm #9948749
Joan E. Hoffman January 26, 2012
I actually have no idea, but wonderful shots of him Mike. What a stunning, regal looking fellow! #9948961Jeff E Jensen January 26, 2012
Beautiful, Mike! #9949034Aimee C. Eisaman January 26, 2012
He's stunning! I love large birds for some reason...esp. owls and hawks. Fantastic detail even in the feathers. In your first shot the branches in the background look odd to me. Probably the DOF along with editing. I wonder if it would look good with an even tigher crop? :~) #9949050Teresa H. Hunt January 26, 2012
My bird identifing is limited to "Oh what a pretty bird" :)These are both really great photos. I love the detail you captured in the feathers. #9949267
Teresa H. Hunt January 26, 2012
I ment "identifying" . . . . can we say spelling challenged #9949270Carla Capra Anderson January 27, 2012
great shots. b/g green = awesome. agree w/aimee = branches n crop. feathers/eye great detail. nice #9950405Michael Kelly January 27, 2012
Thanks Stephen. I am leaning towards the Coopers also, but I'm still not absolutely sure. The Coopers is a lot rarer than the sharp shinned. I sent these pictures into the site and have to see if we get a response.Thank you Joan and Jeff.
Aimee the background is my neighbor’s hedge and it is about 50 feet away from the bird. I will give it a try with a tighter crop and post real soon.
Thanks Teresa and Carla.
#9950572
Rita K. Connell January 27, 2012
definitely a cooper hawk, it looks like the cousin to one that is in my backyard alot. I wish he would snack on a few squirrels...!!I agree with Aimee I find the branches a distraction because they look alittle strange. but a great capture and details is very nice. It was nice of him to sit and pose for you. #9950688
Michael Kelly January 27, 2012
And the new version. #9950691Dale Hardin January 27, 2012
I'm with Teresa on the identification. "Pretty bird" is about it. Nice shot Mike and I like the edits. Would still like to see a bit more difinition though, with a bit of sharpening and a levels tweak. #9950994Mario Rocafuerte January 27, 2012
Definitly it's a pretty bird.. but the composition doesn't work.. my suggestion #9951066Joan E. Hoffman January 27, 2012
I have to admit, I quite like Mario's suggestion... it really makes the hawk shine! #9951222Beth Spencer January 27, 2012
I like your edited version. I have no idea what kind of hawk this is, my husband thinks it might be a Coopers Hawk.Dale Hardin January 27, 2012
Mike, I prefer your edited version because of the composition. The branch offers a nice diagonal and at the same time not only reveals his environment but shows the tools of his trade (the talons) which enhances the overall image of his species. #9951706Aimee C. Eisaman January 28, 2012
The edit looks great! Really brings the attention in to the bird without sacrificing the environment. :~) #9951977Joan E. Hoffman January 28, 2012
Dale brings up a very good point there, and have to admit that I would be loath to give up the perch and talons if I were editing this. I do like Mario's version as well though. #9952355Stephen Shoff January 28, 2012
Mario's crop is good, but it made me realize you'd used a vertical pano crop in your cropped version. I think Mario's idea cropped not quite so tightly and using a normal 2:3 ratio cropped just below the talons might be a good compromise.I really like emphasizing the soft detail and texture of the head/shoulder portrait as a second version of the same image. #9952621
Stephen Shoff January 28, 2012
Mario's crop is good, but it made me realize you'd used a vertical pano crop in your cropped version. I think Mario's idea cropped not quite so tightly and using a normal 2:3 ratio cropped just below the talons might be a good compromise.I really like emphasizing the soft detail and texture of the head/shoulder portrait as a second version of the same image. #9952623
Sue C. Cole January 28, 2012
Mike, I really like Aimee's crop version a lot. Do think it may be a tad soft on detail though, perhaps Dales suggestion are worth trying. I really love the second photo of this amazing bird. #9952803Michael Kelly January 29, 2012
Thanks for all the input everyone. Mario, I like the tight version that you have shown, but I am afraid the pixels won't allow it. I did give it a try but it gets pretty ugly, so I think I need to go with a wider view.The reason I went with the vertical pano, is that I wanted to keep his tail in the photo. It may be that that is not a necessary item in the shot and I may try to compromise suggested by Stephen.
Aimee's suggestion does include sharpening and a levels adjustment suggested by Dale. I am not sure why you're seeing it still soft, Sue. I will give it a try with Stephen's suggestion and add a bit of high pass to see if that will fix the softness issue. Will repost soon.
#9954041
Michael Kelly January 29, 2012
Another attemptStephen Shoff January 29, 2012
Outstanding!I'm always conflicted when I see highly sharpened bird images that pick each filament out in a feather. They are awe-inspiring but not quite true-to-life. You have to be looking really close up to see that detail on most of the feathers. (I have a neighbor with a Yellow Amazon Parrot, 2 Cockatoos, and one cockateil.) To me the sharp but soft texture of the wings looks natural. The realistic detail shows up in the head, the edges of the breast feathers, and the feet. This one's ready to publish, Mike. #9954720
Debbie E. Payne January 29, 2012
Cooper's Hawk or just "Michael's Hawk - this last one is my favorite. It takes something of Mario's suggestion but not bringing him in quite as tight puts the eye in a better place and I like some of the negative space around him. I am glad that you cloned out the extra branches as per Aimee's suggestions. Such a lovely bird and great editing, Michael. Good to be back but I have lots of editing to do. #9954730Teresa H. Hunt January 30, 2012
Your edit looks amazing Mike :) #9956406Sue C. Cole January 30, 2012
Outstanding edit Michael:) #9956658Aimee C. Eisaman January 31, 2012
This crop is good too...pick which one you like best I say. :~) #9957401Peter W. Marks January 31, 2012
The sharp-shinned and the coopers hawks are very similar but the latter has quite a bit larger wingspan i.e. 28" compared with 21" for the sharp-shinned but it is the rounded tail of the coopers which is the most noticable feature as Stephen mentioned. #9957899Ellen H. Robertson January 31, 2012
I really like the last crop.Beautiful capture.Do not know hawks, and I fed the birds last year and created a restaurant for a unknown breed of a big hawk. Problem was he wanted more variety and came after my jack russell while I was standing there, I could almost touch his wing. #9958199
Michael Kelly January 31, 2012
Thanks everyone, I sure appreciate it. I'm pretty sure this is a Cooper's. I sent a copy of the pictures to the website that Stephen provided and they identified it as a Cooper's.I decided to go ahead and submit the last post. Have to see how the judges view it.
Peter they all look big to me, especially when you see them fairly close. So I can't tell the difference in size but I do agree the rounded tail is probably the most telling feature here.
Oh my gosh Ellen, that is a little bit scary. When Mac was a puppy, he was very small. We had more than Hawk, give him the once over.
#9958232
Ellen H. Robertson January 31, 2012
yeah, Mike it was very scary. He would sit on my neighbors garage and scope my yard, and I am in a subdivision. I hadto stay with her the whole time she was out. I do not think he could have gotten my little tub over the fence, but his talons would have done major damage. #9958251Michael Kelly January 31, 2012
Yup Ellen that's what scarred us too. Still does a little but Mac is full grown and weighs 20 lbs so I don't worry too much now. #9958358Ellen H. Robertson February 01, 2012
I have not seen the hawk this year, but our winter has been MILD so far, and I guess he has enough of his natural prey. And I am not providing him with a restaurant by not feeding the birds. #9958898Rita K. Connell February 01, 2012
sorry I am late getting back to this one. your last was spot one and congrats with the EP.I personally like having the hawk around he keeps our squirrel population down. #9959120
Merna L. Nobile February 27, 2012
CONGRATULATIONS! It’s great to know you have something new to smile about and a special reason to be proud.Dale Hardin February 27, 2012
WTG Mike! Congratulations on a superb capture. #10009235Teresa H. Hunt February 27, 2012
Congrats Mike!!! #10009644Joan E. Hoffman February 27, 2012
Missed this one.... and even thought about it, and why wasn't it there.... but it was! Well done Mike! #10009661Aimee C. Eisaman February 28, 2012
Glad the hawk got some much deserved recognition...congrats on your Phinalist! :~) #10011840Michael Kelly February 28, 2012
Thank you all most kindly. Thanks to all who responded on the type of Hawk, also. It is definitely a Cooper's Hawk, and a real beauty. We love having him around. I can't tell you how much I appreciate your comments and input. #10011937Beth Spencer February 28, 2012
Congratulations on a Well Deserved One!! #10012410Debbie E. Payne February 28, 2012
See how good you made this beautiful hawk look, Michael. No wonder he hangs out around your house. Kidding aside, this is a great nature image! Congrats on the Finalist. #10012434Ellen H. Robertson February 28, 2012
Congrats. Beautiful capture!! #10012540Sign up for an interactive online photography course to get critiques on your photos.
Discussions by Category: You can view photo discussions on various themes in the Community > Photo Discussions section of the site.
BetterPhoto Websites: If you see an orange website link directly under the photographer's name, it's totally okay. It's not spam. The reason: BetterPhoto is the one that offers these personal photography websites. We are supporting our clients with those links.
Unavailable EXIF: If there is no other information but 'Unavailable' in the EXIF (meaning no EXIF data exists with the photo), the 'Unavailable' blurb is not displayed. If there is any info, it shows. Many photos have the EXIF stripped out when people modify the image and resave it, before uploading.
The following truth is one of the core philosophies of BetterPhoto:
I hear, I forget.
I see, I remember.
I do, I understand.
You learn by doing. Take your next online photography class.
Copyright for this photo belongs solely to Michael Kelly.
Images may not be copied, downloaded, or used in any way without the expressed, written permission of the photographer.
Contact photographer via gallery
Log in to follow or message this photographer or report this photo.
I already have an account!