Doorways
Uploaded: January 28, 2010
At "The Lost gardens of Heligan" Mevagissey, Cornwall.
1/60sec; f11; ISO200; 80mm fl
Exif: F Number: 11, Exposure Bias Value: 0.33, ExposureTime: 1/160 seconds, Flash: did not fire, compulsory flash mode, Model: Canon EOS 20D
Anthony L. Mancuso January 28, 2010
Intriguing image Peter, makes me wonder whats behind that door...would you consider boosting the contrast and saturation a bit to punch it up a little? #1232281Peter W. Marks January 28, 2010
Thanks Tony, I will give that a shot tomorrow when I get home from the gym. #8338356Peter W. Marks January 28, 2010
Decided not to wait! This club is getting addictive! #8338421Anthony L. Mancuso January 28, 2010
Thanks Peter, I like it. I think you could also go the other way with it and make it a washed out sepia.Hi, my name is Tony and I'm a phelloholic too. #8338477
Rita K. Connell January 28, 2010
phelloholic so that is what we are...Yup that would be us. Peter,tony suggestion looks great, I would love to see it in wash out sepia could be interesting. Peter I do have to ask, have we seen this image before? #8338507Jeff E Jensen January 28, 2010
Yup, I'm an addict as well.The changes worked well Peter.
So, what's behind the door? #8338628
Michael Kelly January 28, 2010
Me too but no pledges.I think that suggestion worked well and another fine English structure presented here Peter. #8338660
Teresa H. Hunt January 28, 2010
Hello, My name is Teresa and I'm a Phelloholic.I really like the edits on this shot Peter. Now you can see the green plants and whatever is on the top shelves . . . without them being distracting.
I'm curious to see what a washed out sepia edit would look like. #8338732
Debbie E. Payne January 29, 2010
I do like your edit, Peter. Now we are all curious about what is lying beyond that door. #8339719Peter W. Marks January 29, 2010
OK Tony and Rita. I have a few versions-shades of sepia so what do you think? And yes Rita the image is in my gallery soemwhere and I have shown it before.Peter W. Marks January 29, 2010
Sepia variationsPeter W. Marks January 29, 2010
Variation 1 #8340204Peter W. Marks January 29, 2010
Variation 2Peter W. Marks January 29, 2010
Variation 3 #8340217Peter W. Marks January 29, 2010
Variation 4Anthony L. Mancuso January 29, 2010
I prefer number 3, I think it conveys the sense of antiquity better than the others. #8340243Peter W. Marks January 29, 2010
Changed my mind on var 4; it was too similar to one of the others.Rita K. Connell January 29, 2010
I like sepia one but not better than the original #8340302Teresa H. Hunt January 29, 2010
I like version 1 and 3. But I think I like 3 the best.Very cool story behind this photo. I find it interesting how stuff can dissapear and then be rediscovered without ever moving. :) #8340645
Susan M. Reynolds January 29, 2010
Definitely addictive and yes...Hello, My name is Susan and I'm a Phelloholic.Joan E. Hoffman January 30, 2010
I am less Phelloholic than I was a year ago... takes a lot of councilling, and self control... however, it IS possible to live at least an hour or so, without checking the posts!My Name is Joan... I am a marginally recovered Phelloholic! #8342938
Joan E. Hoffman January 30, 2010
OH... and Peter... sorry, addictions run rampant. Really find this to be an intrigueing image. I will spend some time this evening visiting the gardens! WOW...great... but very sad storey. #8342941Susan M. Reynolds January 30, 2010
Thanks for providing the information to read about it on line - I see now from some of the photos where you shot your picture of the big stone face covered in greenery...yes, it is a very sad story, but I'm glad the gardens are now beautiful once again. #8342970Michael Kelly January 30, 2010
Peter I am split between the original and version 3 also. Either should work great. #8343005Peter W. Marks January 30, 2010
Heligan is truly a fascinating place if one is at all interested in the late 19th, early 20th century life style of those in Britain who could afford to employ a large staff in their house as well as in their gardens and small- holding farms where they grew and bred everything to sustain a 'well-off' priveleged life-style.Below is what is actually outside the door in my image; just turn left.
#8343124
Susan M. Reynolds January 30, 2010
WoW...if I could just get over there to England some day, the history and charm of the place is a photographer's dream! #8343155Jeff E Jensen January 30, 2010
My vote is for one and three. Very nice Peter! #8343327Dale Hardin January 31, 2010
Great shot Peter. Must have missed one of the images because I see no corrected shots before the sepia entries.My favorite is the original shot but would like to see a crop to draw more attention to the closed door. Try cropping the top to the center of the header on the open door. The area above and especially the upper left corner add nothing to the comp and are a bit distracting. #8344551
Peter W. Marks January 31, 2010
Many thanks to all. Dale, I have cropped dpwn as you suggested. what do you think? Note, this is not intended as a keeper so haven't done any other serious adjustments. #8344614Dale Hardin January 31, 2010
Thanks Peter, but now that I see it, methinks I didn't go far enough. Scroll up to the bottom of the stone arch and I think you'd have it. #8345255Peter W. Marks January 31, 2010
Crop down as per Dale. I personally think this does not work at all well. I would appreciate you telling me why you prefer this. To me it cuts out much of what this very old building has that makes it different from modern double glazed constructions and when I stood in that doorway, my version was what I saw and what appealed to me.Debbie E. Payne January 31, 2010
Peter, Here I am, coming in late. I prefer the colors in the original shot. I like your "original crop height" version best and don't think it needs anymore cropping. #8345329Rita K. Connell January 31, 2010
really like the height crop of the original that really does draw you even more to the close door. Now when looking at the first post thanks to Dale it is a distraction the area above the door frame. #8345693Dale Hardin January 31, 2010
You're right Peter. I prefer the first crop I suggested better. Don't know what I was thinking. Another senior moment I guess. :o) #8345741Anthony L. Mancuso February 01, 2010
I like the first crop as well...I guess Dale is human after all.. #8346679Dale Hardin February 01, 2010
Well, almost anyway. :o) #8347331Debbra Bailey February 02, 2010
Coming in VERY late. I was away to a wedding this weekend :) I vote for Dale's first crop. Very interesting image! #8350472Sign up for an interactive online photography course to get critiques on your photos.
Discussions by Category: You can view photo discussions on various themes in the Community > Photo Discussions section of the site.
BetterPhoto Websites: If you see an orange website link directly under the photographer's name, it's totally okay. It's not spam. The reason: BetterPhoto is the one that offers these personal photography websites. We are supporting our clients with those links.
Unavailable EXIF: If there is no other information but 'Unavailable' in the EXIF (meaning no EXIF data exists with the photo), the 'Unavailable' blurb is not displayed. If there is any info, it shows. Many photos have the EXIF stripped out when people modify the image and resave it, before uploading.
The following truth is one of the core philosophies of BetterPhoto:
I hear, I forget.
I see, I remember.
I do, I understand.
You learn by doing. Take your next online photography class.
Copyright for this photo belongs solely to Peter W. Marks.
Images may not be copied, downloaded, or used in any way without the expressed, written permission of the photographer.
Log in to follow or message this photographer or report this photo.
I already have an account!