Old workshop ver 2

© Peter W. Marks

Old workshop ver 2

Uploaded: October 10, 2009

Description

Estate workshop and tools from the 1930's at Heligan Gardens, Cornwall

1/10sec; f5.6; ISO 400; 10mm
Topaz Detail in PS

Exif: F Number: 5.6, Exposure Bias Value: 0.00, ExposureTime: 1/10 seconds, Flash: fired, compulsory flash mode, ISO: 400, FocalLength: 10.00 mm, Model: Canon EOS 20D

Comments

Peter W. Marks October 12, 2009

Your critique would be much appreciated. Does this work?
Would YOU have made this image? And if 'no', why not?
And if 'yes' would you have done it differently and why? #1191287

Melissa Olsen October 14, 2009

Peter, I for one very much like the composition in this image. Photography is an art and what you see is what your artistic design is all about. I say you did well. #8036948

Peter W. Marks October 14, 2009

Melissa. Thank you so very much for that response. I was prompted to ask for a critique couched in these terms because I want to encourage BP members to step out the box that seems to constrain so many of them to only saying "Awesome, great POV". That is valid of course but I long to hear what they see that makes it "awesome". I would be not in the least offended if someone says my Old Workshop image is "Too Photoshopped" or "too dark", but I would then challenge them to explain how that has negatively affected their perception of the image.
I realise that it may well be I who doesn't understand what photography is all about but what I would like is for folk to not only tell me what they see in my work but to also tell me what their intentions were when they made their own images.
It probably will only rarely happen Melissa and that is why I appreciate your contribution.
Regards, Pete #8037175

Jeffrey R. Whitmoyer October 14, 2009

I think it's a great shot overall. If it were my image I would try to tone down the top of the workbench just a little bit. It just seems a little over bright to me, a little subtler look should help to give the hand tools more detail. Hope I got my words straight on this one.
Jeff #8037376

Peter W. Marks October 14, 2009

Hi Jeff. That is an interesting response and I follow what you are saying and don't disagree at all. Rightly or wrongly, and in art there really isn't 'right' or 'wrong' I deliberately allowed the tools to be bright, although perhaps a little less so would work well. The window itself was completely blown so I selected that and dodged it to give some detail and could easily have done the same on the bench.
Thanks again Friend. Pete #8037655

Peter W. Marks October 14, 2009

Well of course I meant 'burn' not 'dodge'. Sheesh! #8037782

Jeffrey R. Whitmoyer October 14, 2009

I agree 100% about no right or wrong in art. It's all about personal taste and we should always shoot and process to please ourselves first. After all, art is our interpretation of what we see. That relates to what has become a pet peeve of mine: the person who thinks that digital photography is some kind of illegitimate child of "real" photography. If it originates in the camera, regardless of capture medium it is photography. #8037819

Peter W. Marks October 15, 2009

Good morning Jeff. This has been a subject that I have come across on some websites, that consumes thousands of lines of type as folk argue back and forth. Great fun or a total bore depending on one's viewpoint (or which side seems to be winning the argument!)
And you are so right about we "pixel pushers", sure gets some "dark-room denizens" ranting and raving. Then someone quietly points out that Ansell Adams did some adjustments to his prints!Ho hum!
Have a great one Jeff. #8038667

Thomas Ehlers October 19, 2009

Hey Peter, I like it, I think I would have toned down the light hitting the work bench. Oveall I like it alot! Thanks for posting it old friend!!! #8051118

To discuss, first log in or sign up (buttons are at top center of page).

Get Constructive Critiques

Sign up for an interactive online photography course to get critiques on your photos.


 

Did You Know?

Discussions by Category: You can view photo discussions on various themes in the Community > Photo Discussions section of the site.

BetterPhoto Websites: If you see an orange website link directly under the photographer's name, it's totally okay. It's not spam. The reason: BetterPhoto is the one that offers these personal photography websites. We are supporting our clients with those links.

Unavailable EXIF: If there is no other information but 'Unavailable' in the EXIF (meaning no EXIF data exists with the photo), the 'Unavailable' blurb is not displayed. If there is any info, it shows. Many photos have the EXIF stripped out when people modify the image and resave it, before uploading.


 

The following truth is one of the core philosophies of BetterPhoto:

I hear, I forget.
I see, I remember.
I do, I understand.

You learn by doing. Take your next online photography class.


BetterPhoto.com Editor's Pick


Copyright for this photo belongs solely to Peter W. Marks.
Images may not be copied, downloaded, or used in any way without the expressed, written permission of the photographer.
Log in to follow or message this photographer or report this photo.