BetterPhoto Q&A
Category: New Answers

Photography Question 

Mike R. Howe
 

HDR images


Is it possible to make an HDR (High Dynamic Range) image from one Raw image? Or do you need several images?


To love this question, log in above
September 20, 2010

 
- Gregory LaGrange

BetterPhoto Member
Contact Gregory LaGrange
Gregory LaGrange's Gallery
  Yes. Not much difference than the expected way of taking several photos of different exposures. Raw file converters have exposure adjustments. Or you could pull detail out of different areas, which is another way of saying lightening or darkening areas. I'm sure there are several programs out there (tone mapping, etc.) that will do a large part of the work for you. It's just the dynamic range is greater with using several photos.


To love this comment, log in above
September 20, 2010

 
- Carolyn M. Fletcher

BetterPhoto Member
BetterPhoto Crew: Volunteer
Contact Carolyn M. Fletcher
Carolyn M. Fletcher's Gallery
  Topaz Adjust has a single image HDR preset. You have to play around with it a bit, but it does a fairly good impression of an HDR shot.


To love this comment, log in above
September 21, 2010

 
- Carlton Ward

BetterPhoto Member
Contact Carlton Ward
Carlton Ward's Gallery
 
Here is an example of 1 image made to look like an HDR image with Photomatix 4 – HDR/Tonemapping

DenaliHDR

Carlton


To love this comment, log in above
September 21, 2010

 

Ryan Murphy
  Hi Mike - You can quite easily make an HDR image from a single Raw file (and in fact, while the dynamic range may not be as strong as combining different files of varying exposure levels, you have the advantage of not having to worry about aligning the images, motion distortion, etc.)
The trick is to create multiple different files of varying exposure levels from the same source file. When I create an HDR image from a single file, I typically save anywhere from 3-5 TIFF files of the same source image but with varied exposure levels (e.g., -4, -2, 0, +2, +4).
Specifically, I open the source image in Adobe Raw, adjust the exposure level to the desired amount (leaving all the other adjustments levers constant), save the file as a .tif, then repeat the same process until I have 3-5 .tif files all of the same image, but with different exposures.
If you use Photomatix, you simply have to load these exposure-adjusted files and go through the HDR process the same way you would if you had multiple images.
As with all HDR images, once you are done tone mapping in Photomatix, you can reopen in Photoshop and make additional adjustments as desired (e.g., noise reduction, sharpening, curves, etc.)
One disadvantage of the single-file HDR method is that it tends to produce much noiser images in the shadow areas.
Hope that helps!


To love this comment, log in above
September 21, 2010

 

Mike R. Howe
  Thank so much Gregory,Carolyn,Carlton and Ryan for your responses. I really appreciate your helpful advice and for taking the time to share this info. Thanks again!!! Mike


To love this comment, log in above
September 21, 2010

 

Kathryn Wesserling
  Mike - thank YOU for even asking such a question (that one never occurred to me.)

Knowing that there is a way (without worrying about the lining up, etc) and that Topaz's preset works on this inspires me to try it.

Thanks, Everyone for your imput - and Carlton for your linked example.


To love this comment, log in above
September 28, 2010

 

Stanley C. Sims
  There is one more way that I read about.
Take one raw image, over expose around 1/3 to 1/2 to reduce the noise that one image will contain. Go to your raw converter and make the necessary tonal and noise reductions. Save as a 16 bit Tiff file, and open this file up in your HDR program. Try this method if something is moving, and you want to stop it.


To love this comment, log in above
September 28, 2010

 

Richard Lynch
  It is possible to create HDR-like results as others have said, but not optimal -- at least not for the realistic advantage of HDR. HDR images are actually the 32-bit composites of several images, the idea of High Dynamic Range being that it is information compiled with greater bit-depth -- more than is currently captured by consumer digital cameras. There is a 'problem' in that the images can't really be displayed on traditional monitors, and there is no real method of printing. What is commonly known as an HDR image is not really HDR at all, but an image converted FROM HDR. These are often more fanciful results that attempt to compress HDR information into a usable visual form.

I often will bracket these days just to have the opportunity to create HDR images or process to HDR results. it offers a lot of flexibility and opportunities to interpret.

I hope that helps some! Of course there is more information in my Awesome Digital Projects course which covers Panoramas, HDR, conversion to B&W, and toning.

Richard


To love this comment, log in above
September 30, 2010

 
This old forum is now archived. Use improved Forum here

Report this Thread