BetterPhoto Q&A
Category: New Answers

Photography Question 

Cindy Sanders
 

Cannot Get the Correct Exposure


 
  Exposure Issues
Exposure Issues

Cindy Sanders

 
 
Hi. I received advice earlier on how to take pics at a hockey game, but when I tried the settings given to me, I could not get the correct exposure. I'm adding one of the pic's set to manual mode - 1/125 - 4.0 - iso 400 (800 was very grainy) EF70-300mm @ 70.0 and on evaluative metering. Can anyone explain to me what I'm doing incorrectly? Thank you,
Cindy


To love this question, log in above
February 21, 2009

 

Richard Lynch
  Cindy,
Photography requires light, and if you are under-exposing you need one of several things to happen:

- You need more light
- You need the camera to be more sensitive to light
- You need to let in more light

Doing the first requires changing the lighting conditions (e.g., adding a flash). Doing the second requires increasing ISO (makes the camera more sensitive to light; like high ISO film). Doing the third requires changing camera settings (increasing the aperture diameter; decreasing shutter speed).

There are limitations in accord with what you are shooting. As you are looking to shoot sports/action, you do not want to lower shutter speed a lot unless you desire blur. Your other options are a wider aperture or higher ISO. If your camera delivers grainy high ISO images, you may actually need to consider different equipment. For example, I love my Sigma SD14, but it is not very good for low-light conditions. If I were to want to seriously shoot high ISO with existing light, I'd really need to get another camera (on the other hand, it is fine with long exposures and low ISO). I see why you may want a longer lens to shoot hockey, but you can pick up some additional light with a faster lens (f2.8) ... probably at no small expense, and with a trade-off on depth-of-field.

So, I'm not sure that you are doing things so much 'incorrectly' as that there may not be enough in your setup and with existing lighting to support what you want to shoot. You may be able to adjust 16-bit exposures to recover some of this, but if it is a need, you'll want a better long-term solution.

I hope that helps!


To love this comment, log in above
February 22, 2009

 
- Ken Smith

BetterPhoto Member
Contact Ken Smith
Ken Smith's Gallery
  Cindy, try an experiment, preferably using the same lighting conditions as the hockey game ... put your camera on a tripod, put in aperture mode at F4, ISO 400. Click the shutter button or cable release ... then, check what the camera thinks is an auto-exposure. Is it bright enough? And if so, what is the shutter speed? My guess is it's more than 1/125th sec that you show ... unless somehow you've accidently set your exposure compensation way down; e.g., minus 3.


To love this comment, log in above
February 22, 2009

 

Cindy Sanders
 
 
  The one that got away
The one that got away
ISO 640 - 50mm - f2.0 - 1/250

Cindy Sanders

 
  What do you think the ref. is looking at?
What do you think the ref. is looking at?
ISO 500 - 50mm - f2.0 - 1/200

Cindy Sanders

 
 
Thank you Ken and Richard. Your advice has helped me a lot. I did the experiment with my camera as suggested. I found that on manual mode for some reason the camera sets the exposure compensation to -2 under these conditions. Strange, huh??? So I used my 50mm f1.8 lens today and I got a lot better shots. Again thank you both Cindy


To love this comment, log in above
February 22, 2009

 
This old forum is now archived. Use improved Forum here

Report this Thread