BetterPhoto Q&A
Category: New Questions

Photography Question 
Craig Demartino
 

Image Stabilization Lens


With the current line of Canon lenses, is it still better to buy a fast lens, 2.8? Or is it OK to go with a slower lens with image stabilization (IS)? It goes against all my past knowledge to do that, but I'm wondering if the technology is so good it does not matter. Thanks!


To love this question, log in above
8/15/2005 8:51:55 AM

 
Jon Close
BetterPhoto Member Since: 5/18/2000
  IS is a great feature for getting sharp shots hand-held without blurring from camera shake. It is not a replacement for f/2.8 or faster lenses when the primary concern is shallow depth of field, or a fast shutter speed to freeze subject motion. Thus, some of Canon's f/2.8 lenses also incorporate IS (eg., EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS USM, EF 300 f/2.8L IS USM).


To love this comment, log in above
8/15/2005 9:03:39 AM

 
Ron Taylor   Just a second "Amen" to the EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS USM. I have a several other IS lenses and the 70-200 is my favorite by far. Great lens!


To love this comment, log in above
8/16/2005 5:13:01 AM

 
Log in to respond or ask your own question.