BetterPhoto.com - Become a better photographer today!
EMAIL:
PASSWORD:
remember me:     
     


BetterPhoto Q&A
Category: New Questions

To participate in the Forum, become a BetterPhoto member or Sign In.

 
Photography Question 
Craig Demartino

member since: 8/9/2005
 

Image Stabilization Lens


With the current line of Canon lenses, is it still better to buy a fast lens, 2.8? Or is it OK to go with a slower lens with image stabilization (IS)? It goes against all my past knowledge to do that, but I'm wondering if the technology is so good it does not matter. Thanks!

8/15/2005 8:51:55 AM

 
Jon Close
BetterPhoto Member

member since: 5/18/2000
  IS is a great feature for getting sharp shots hand-held without blurring from camera shake. It is not a replacement for f/2.8 or faster lenses when the primary concern is shallow depth of field, or a fast shutter speed to freeze subject motion. Thus, some of Canon's f/2.8 lenses also incorporate IS (eg., EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS USM, EF 300 f/2.8L IS USM).

8/15/2005 9:03:39 AM

 
Ron Taylor

member since: 10/16/2003
  Just a second "Amen" to the EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS USM. I have a several other IS lenses and the 70-200 is my favorite by far. Great lens!

8/16/2005 5:13:01 AM

 

To participate in the Forum, become a BetterPhoto member or Sign In.
 

Copyright 1996-2014 BetterPhoto.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.