Photo Discussion
Category: Friendly Praise Archive

To discuss a photo, sign up as a BetterPhoto member or log in.

 

bri


 
  bri
bri
1/250 f16

bob garas

 
 
 

Manuel Barrera
 

Excellent work, beautiful portrait


To love this question, log in above
January 29, 2007

 

Colette M. Metcalf
  Beautifully done, Bob!


To love this comment, log in above
January 29, 2007

 

Terri L. Scribner
  This is great, Bob!! Beautiful!!


To love this comment, log in above
January 29, 2007

 

Jane M
  Like the lighting and colors here Bob


To love this comment, log in above
January 29, 2007

 

Christy Nichols
  Great capture! Love the colors. :)


To love this comment, log in above
January 29, 2007

 

Datha Y. Thompson
  Adorable!! Beautiful colors and lighting!! Love her big eyes and expression!! Very Sweet!! :0)


To love this comment, log in above
January 29, 2007

 
photosbyjanine.com - Janine Russell

BetterPhoto Member
Contact Janine Russell
Janine Russell's Gallery
  Bob, great colors, clarity, lighting and effects; sweet portrait.


To love this comment, log in above
January 29, 2007

 
- Donna K. Kilcher

BetterPhoto Member
Contact Donna K. Kilcher
Donna K. Kilcher's Gallery
  wow! great portrait


To love this comment, log in above
February 19, 2007

 

Bunny Snow
  In my opinion, the portrait would have been better if the child was turned a little more to her left. The reason is because of the awful shadow on the right side of her face created because of the positioning of the light as it hit her nose, lips and chin.

It's impossible to see what will occur when using speed lights. I made this mistake often until I bought myself some White Lightning monolights with an incadescent modeling light. The modeling light allowed me to see what my carefully measured flash would do in advance to firing the shutter.

One does not need to go to the expense as I did, but a modeling light is crucial to see the shadow that will be cast by facial features from the positioning of the flash. Posing plus lighting can make or break a portrait.

On the other hand, the expression is wonderfully captured!


To love this comment, log in above
September 18, 2007

 

bob garas
  hi bunny. thanks for your coments. I my self like the shadows just for definition. and you are probably right. how ever, with chidren and animals sometimes you just take what you can get,to get them to duplicate actions and expression is some times impossible.

i try to experiment with different light angles to see the results

thanks again. take care


To love this comment, log in above
September 18, 2007

 

Bunny Snow
  Hi Bob,

Having specialized in children's photography 30 years ago, I understand that duplicating actions and expressions is impossible. This is why lighting has to be correct before the "talent" comes before the camera.

John Siskin, an instructor at BP.com has created Light Panels, sometimes refers to as "scrims", which allow the photographer to make a small light source into a large light source.

What I learned from a class in classical portraiture and lighting in the town where I live, is the larger the light source, the more diffused the lighting. And, the smaller the light source, the more defined (sharper) the edges of the shadow.

In the past, I've used soft boxes with my studio lights, and white foam core to bounce (and soften) the light of my portable flash.

In my class, we also learned to create one to one or 1:1.5 lighting ratios for children; 1:1.5 to 1:2 lighting ratios for women; and over 1:2 lighting ratios for men (to be printable a ratio could go as high as 1:4, if I recall).

At 1:1.5 there is still a slight difference between the highlights and the shadows, but it is not as pronounced as the lighting ratio you have which I suspect is closer to 1:4.

The measurement is taken using a flash meter, such as a Sekonic L-358 flash meter. http://tinyurl.com/2r9wl3

See Metering for Strobes at:
http://www.eddiebonfigli.com/L358.html for a shorter description (than I could give) on using a Flash Meter.

I love your captures! But, I personally don't like the sharp definition and angles of the shadows on the child. It is my opinion that you could make future images so much better with a larger light source and a lighting ratio more conducive to children.



To love this comment, log in above
September 19, 2007

 
Log in or sign up to respond or interact.