BetterPhoto Q&A
Category: New Answers

Photography Question 

BetterPhoto Member
 

Leica Minilux vs. Contax T3


Since I want a high quality compact camera, with the option of manual override, and would never take an SLR with me due to its size and weight. I do care more about lens quality than having a zoom, and want a camera I can keep for the next 2-3 decades. It has come down to pretty much the Leica Minilux vs. the Contax T3.

So far it seems to me that the Minilux vs. the Contax has
- worse controls / not as user friendly
- larger/heavier (although some people seem to like that)
+ those Leica colors
+ usually about $100 cheaper

Any input or experiences with either camera would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks
Ben


To love this question, log in above
May 05, 2002

 

doug Nelson
  May I offer other options? The Ricoh GR-1S has a 28-mm lens using Leica specs. It's becoming a backpacker cult classic for its excellent lens quality. It has manual override, a lens shade, and is cheaper than either of the other two. If a 28 is to your liking, check it out at kbcamera.com under point n' shoots.

When I want to go light, but care about image quality, I carry a Minolta CLE with a Leica 40-mm lens. It was made in the early 80's, is metal, with metal gears, so is not as light as the others mentioned.

A new Voigtlander Bessa R2 with their cheapest, but still excellent, 35-mm f2.5 lens is light, but $400 cheaper than the used CLE above. Look into rangefinders at cameraquest.com.


To love this comment, log in above
May 10, 2002

 
This old forum is now archived. Use improved Forum here

Report this Thread