Donna DeRousie |
Advise on lens for NIKON D200 Lens advice for my Nikon D200 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi - I am just starting out as a child portrait photographer and have alot to learn - and some gear to aquire. I would really love some advice about which lens to purchase. I will be shooting in studio and on location at the local park. Style wise, I only really like a selective focus - a shallower depth of field and therefore try and shoot wide open as much as possible - the only problem being - I mostly shoot fast moving and erratic subjects (toddlers). Therefore I usually have heaps of reject images based on fuzziness. I bought the 50mm 1.4 and have had much more success with focus as it is faster than my old glass, but I need something with a longer focal length. I know the 85mm 1.8 is great but my 2 concerns are: feel like I need variable focal length for the park, and maybe 85mm isn't different enough from the 50mm in focal length. My other two lenses are: AF 24-85mm 2.8-4 (seems very slow to focus on a moving subject - rubbish compared to my 50mm). THE OTHER IS 4-5.6mm AF 70-210. Very old and seems slow but just found it and haven't really used it alot. I am only interested in Nikon lenses. Money isn't an issue - I just want the right lens. Love the 70-200 2.8 but a bit concerned about weight. Don't know if I should be. What do you all think I should get? Long posting I know. Thanks
|
|
|
||
Debby A. Tabb |
Donna, this is from another post. I personally like Tamron Lens as well as the Nikon. I find it best to work with my 200mm You may also find alot of help in the Studio Photography Threads: Thread # 1 (of 23) http://www.betterphoto.com/forms/QnAdetail.php?threadID=17534
|
|
|
||
Jessica A. Eiss |
Hi Donna, Basically you want a fixed aperture lens- a 2.8. you already have a standard 50 mm lens which is fast, but with the 1.4, you've probably found out that you have to be very careful about your focal point. I just bought the Sigma 50-150 mm II lens. It's a pro grade, and a 2.8 It isn't a small lens, but is nice. Basically, you need to find the zoom range and the brand of lens you want, your price point you can work with and get a fixed 2.8.
|
|
|
||
William Schuette |
Hi Donna, if your budget can handle it, the Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 VR makes an outstanding portrait lens. It is very sharp, good contrast and at 150-200mm can easily throw your backgrounds out of focus with beautiful bokeh. Also, for moving subjects the VR does help stabilize the shot when panning. Bill
|
|
|
||
Donna DeRousie |
Thanks for all your feedback. I'm thinking of the 105mm vr 2.8. It is fixed but much lighter than the 70-200mm. Does anyone have any thoughts on this?
|
|
|
||
William Schuette |
Hi Donna, I have the 105 Micro VR as well. It is also a wonderful lens for both macro work and portraits. It has very creamy bokeh on out of focus backgrounds. Very sharp and contrasty. It has the second generation VR which is a slight advantage over the 70-200. The only disadvantage is that you are stuck with the one focal length and will have to use the old fashioned foot zoom. Bill
|
|
|
||
This old forum is now archived. Use improved Forum here
Report this Thread |