 Renaee Dimond |
Landscape/all purpose lens for Canon Hi everyone, I was hoping for some direction as to which landscape/all purpose lens I should purchase. I'm leaning toward the 17-40L for landscape and the 24-105L for general purpose. IF anyone owns either of these lenses can you please let me know what you think of them I already have the 70-200 f/4 L so do you think the 24-104 would be overkill?
|
|
|
|
||
|
doug Nelson |
If you can afford "L" lenses, you can't go wrong with any of them. See www.luminous-landscape.com for advice on Canon lenses for landscape.
|
|
|
|
||
- Ken Smith Contact Ken Smith Ken Smith's Gallery |
I have the 24-105L lens...use it all the time, and even for landscapes..you don't have to have a wide angle lens for landscapes. I also have the 70-200 F4/L lens. If you want wide angle...consider the Sigma 10-20mm F4-5.6. I like it very much.
|
|
|
|
||
|
Peter K. Burian |
Renaee: I own both of those lenses and use them for professional applications. And yes, a 10-20mm or similar zoom would be great too for ultra wide angle photography - assuming you own a Digital (not film) camera. Lenses of that type are strictly for digital cameras. Cheers! Peter K. Burian
|
|
|
|
||
|
This old forum is now archived. Use improved Forum here
Report this Thread |
||