BetterPhoto Q&A
Category: New Questions

Photography Question 
Kathleen Brennan
BetterPhoto Member Since: 6/3/2006
 

canon lens


I am interested in a landscape lens for my Canon 30D. I have looked at the Canon EF 24-105 f/4 IS lens and wonder how it compares to the Canon 28-135 IS lens. I notice the 28-135 is significantly cheaper. Any opinions?


To love this question, log in above
10/23/2006 7:13:43 AM

 
Glenn E. Urquhart
BetterPhoto Member Since: 1/3/2006
  Hi Kathleen - Had to upgrade from a 20D to a 5D (long story). Loved the 20D and had an EFS 17-85mm IS USM lens. Excellent combo for landscapes, which is my main focus. Could not use the EFS lens on the 5D and bought the 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM lens. The quality is beyond belief! Well worth the price! Now that said, the 5D has a 35mm format sized sensor. That means I truly get a 24mm wide angle lens to a 105 telephoto. On the 30D, your sensor is the same as a 20D, which means you would be getting a minimum of 38mm, which is not much of a wide angle lens. The 28-135 IS, you would not get any wide angle lens.
My advise, would be look at the EFS 17-85mm lens, which will give you wide angle and a good telephoto (35mm format equivalent is 28 to 135mm), great lens for landscapes.
Hope this helps! Good luck with your choice, Cheers, Glenn.


To love this comment, log in above
10/23/2006 1:08:26 PM

 
Samuel Smith
BetterPhoto Member Since: 1/21/2004
  single focal length for landscapes.you pick.it's just better glass.
sam


To love this comment, log in above
10/23/2006 9:25:52 PM

 
John P. Sandstedt
BetterPhoto Member Since: 8/8/2001
Contact John
John's Gallery
  Kathleen,

I have the 17-85 mm for my 30D and love it, although there are reports on a chromation aberation issue with it [that I've not noticed.

Tamron has just come out with a 17-50 mm lens that's worth looking at. It's equivalent to a 28-80 mm traditional lens and might be well suited to landscapes. I personally think the range is too narrow, but the f/2.8 speed is inviting.

Based on the fact that the major manufacturers seem to be producing many more zooms [in a variety of ranges,] it's no longer clear than fixed focal length lenses assure better images.


To love this comment, log in above
10/24/2006 7:50:29 AM

 
Samuel Smith
BetterPhoto Member Since: 1/21/2004
  after thinking about this for a while,you guys are right.sometimes there is something distracting or unappealing in a scene.guess I can save myself some walking.
thanks,sam


To love this comment, log in above
10/26/2006 1:45:58 PM

 
Justin G.
BetterPhoto Member Since: 7/13/2004
  Well Kathleen, with your FOVCF, will "38mm" be wide enough for you? I believe there's a Sigma 10-22 or something close to that. That should get you in pretty wide. That'd be "simulating" a 15-33mm lens. That's got everything from ultra-wide, to just wide.


To love this comment, log in above
10/26/2006 9:45:48 PM

 
Log in to respond or ask your own question.