 Tami Rook |
Portrait ??
Capture the light?
|
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
W. |
1) that little boy has brown eyes, with black pupils. 3) EVERYbody has black pupils. 2) brown eyes don't capture light any more than blue or green eyes do.
|
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Tami Rook |
per the mother they are black.. brown perhaps then very very dark brown. however thx for the education... The mothers eyes did not capture the light where they are both in the photo?
|
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
W. |
Then the mother needs new glasses: NO human being has black eyes (= black irises). They don't exist. "The mothers eyes did not capture the light where they are both in the photo?" But if you want catchlights in the mothers' eyes: you could fake 'm in PP.
|
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Tami Rook |
I did state "perhaps very very dark brown" however if you like to push...
This is from a leading genotype medical facility Thank you
|
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Jagadeesh Andrew Owens |
Sounds like W. needs to get out with his camera if all he has to do is argue the varying shades of eye color... ;>O He may also want to spend some time with a book on manners... oh - on the argument of light being caught differently by different colors of eyes, if the same color rules hold true for eyeballs and irises as they do for the rest of the color world, then darker eyes would indeed absorb (capture) more light. I'm out. Sipho Eish
|
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Tami Rook |
Sipho Thank you that does make sense, Black does seem to take in the light. So ???? how do you fix that with lighting, since the complexion is darker if I back the lights we loose definition that sets the personality LOL stated the facts once it was clear that he just wanted to argue, I said thank you for the education he still seemed to want to argue ??? why he should have checked the facts OK 1 shame on me. Sorry
|
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Jagadeesh Andrew Owens |
I'm not exactly sure if I'm understanding what you want. The one thing that W correctly stated is that those white spots are called catchlights - and you want them! They're a good thing! I don't understand or use studio lighting, so I can't help you there. I can say that the photo has great catchlights.
|
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Mark Feldstein |
The greater the opacity, the higher it's reflective value. Pupils don't "capture" anything. They reflect. The reflection is more apparent the darker the pupil. Lighter pupils still produce catchlights. The most effective lighting set-up produces a catchlight at either the 10:00 or 2:00 position of the eye. A single light in each eye, not two or more, is most like what's referred to as "Rembrandt Lighting". Named after the famous photographer Sidney Milton Rembrandt of Comoniwannashootya, Ontario, Canada.
|
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Tami Rook |
LOL ok now you can see just how new I am to this….. here I did it right and I am trying to figure out how to stop getting that 1 light…. Darn it !!! now that I know this I probably will not be able to capture it again…. Thank you Guys for all the help
|
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
- Gregory LaGrange Contact Gregory LaGrange Gregory LaGrange's Gallery |
Pupils are just an opening. The reflection comes off the wet surface. And it's just easier to see with dark eyes. That's what is meant by capture, not capture as absorbtion. Glossy black GTO, easy to see all the reflecions. Glossy white '51 Chevy Deluxe 2 door sedan, looks nice but the reflections are as prevalent.
|
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Tami Rook |
Thank you Gregory, That makes Sense in a big way... Thank you again
|
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Samuel Smith |
tami, my neck is starting to hurt,or did my monitor fall over? sam
|
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Samuel Smith |
oh I forgot,that's hilarious.
|
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Tami Rook |
LOL Sorry Sam, just wanted to see who might notice LMAO... ok no no can I turn it after it has been uploaded?
|
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
This old forum is now archived. Use improved Forum here
Report this Thread |
|||||||||||
