Wayne Turk |
Water in Motion ? I have read somewhere, to take photo's of water in motion, like a stream or waterfall one should use a slow shutter speed setting. Can anyone tell me how slow as a starting point. 1/60, 1/30, etc. or much slower then that. I want to photograph some small waterfalls in our area. Thank You
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Michelle Ross |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Ken Raymond |
If you want the water to have a soft blurred effect then yes you will want to use a slow shutter speed. Depending on how fast the water is moving I like to use between one and two seconds or sometines even longer, make sure you use a tripod, a cable release or timer and possibly a neutral density filter to block some light so you can achieve the slower shutter speeds.
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Bob Chance |
Michelle: Ken is right. It all really depens on how fast the water is moving and how much of a blurred effect you are looking for.
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Nobu Nagase |
It usually has to be slower than 1/60 and 1/30 you mentioned. Just last week, I shot this image at a not so pretty local creek in Central Texas. (Creeks and streams in this area just do not have the lush green foliage and moss covered creek bed.) It was in the mid morning and the sun was already out... but fortunately clouds were floating here and there. I waited until the sun went behind the cloud so that the shooting condition became more desirable. For this shot, ISO 100, F32, 1/3sec, and a tripod mount: to get this result. Since I did not have an ND filter, I used a polarizer.
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Wayne Turk |
Thanks so much for the feed back. I shot with a Nikon F5, and have been using Fuji Provia 100F film. I use my Gitzo 1348 tripod but have been shoting in aperture mode instead of shutter mode, and I just been closing the aperture down each time. Thanks so much for all your feed back, time to get outside and take some pictures. Wayne
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Bob Cammarata |
Wayne, I shoot Provia 100F almost exclusively and can offer the following advice: *1/15 second or longer will veil vertical falls nicely. On a cloudy day...and at close range, you can even get to 1 second or more at ASA 100 without any filters to create cotton-like effects. *When metering, do it manually. *When composing, try to include a darker element in the foreground or background to contrast the rapids. Lighter elements within the scene will become blended with the water and hard to discern when the water veils. *If the weather is bright and sunny, find some shade. *Also when shooting in shaded bright sunlight, try to avoid including any parts of the falls or rapids in the frame which are exposed to the harsh sun...especially if you are using long shutter speeds to show motion. Bob
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
BetterPhoto Member |
This one was shot on ISO 50 Konica at one second.
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Bob Chance |
I through in my two cents worth and still owe one. Bob
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Bob Chance |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
BetterPhoto Member |
I can only offer a penny's worth so I'll say, COOL SHOT.
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Bob Chance |
Thanks Mark: Not exactly what I was hoping for. There are much grander falls in the park, unfortunately the trails to them were still closed off due to hazardous conditions from the winter. Perhaps in another month or so they should have things cleared out and the trails open again.
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
BetterPhoto Member |
Okay, you did a great job, Bob. Now, about the waterfall in my shot. I shot that waterfall by mounting the camera on a monopod and holding it about two inches above the water.The lense was a 28-70mm zoom set to 28mm. The entire cascade was about 18 inches high and about three feet wide. I used perspective distortion to make it look bigger. Let me log in and I'll download the first pic I took and you can tell just how big it is from the cars about 100 feet away.
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Bob Chance |
Thanks for the compliment Mark. Didn't really think of it as being anything special. Just sort of set the camera up, adjusted for as long a shutter speed as light and lens would allow and made the shot. We were surprised at how low the water level was though. Normally much higher than that, especially this time of year. But then again, we really didn't get the snow fall that we normally do. It snowed a lot, just never really accumilated. So, were you standing in the water when you made your shot? I'm trying to picture in my mind how you had the camera mounted on a monopod, and yet were able to be only two inches above the water? Must be one of those table top monopods! Tee! Hee! Bob
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Craig m. Zacarelli |
also, using a lens with Anti Shake is usefull but the ND filter (and polorizer) will make any colors pop too, as well as stop down any sunlight. I have shot some water at 1/8 and some at 1-2 seconds. Just use a tripod.. you will need it! I need to find some real waterfalls to shoot! Craig-
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
BetterPhoto Member |
Have fun and keep shooting,
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Bob Chance |
Wow! That is quite a difference. So I take it that this is just a stream, possibly only exhibiting the torrent of water caused by heavy rainfall or snow melt? When I lived in Pa, we had a stream running through our property and I got some nice shots of that. It did have some rocks that the water cascaded over, but I wouldn't call it a waterfall. Bob
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
BetterPhoto Member |
You got it.
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
This old forum is now archived. Use improved Forum here
Report this Thread |