BetterPhoto Q&A
Category: New Answers

Photography Question 

anonymous
 

Ok, here is my ghost bride photo?


 
 
Ok, can anyone explain this, I am baffled? All I can think off is that I maybe breathed on the camera lense and it fogged up for awhile while I was taking the photos then it disappeared. I was able to fix it, it is in my gallery, but looks better in B&W as I couldn't get their skin tones right.


To love this question, log in above
September 26, 2005

 

anonymous
 
 
 
Sorry,here it is


To love this comment, log in above
September 26, 2005

 

Cathy Stancil
  Very strange, nathalie...Sorry no answer for you, just really curious to what other people might think !!


To love this comment, log in above
September 26, 2005

 

anonymous
  Tell me about it! It only happened to about 6 shots, but all of the same pose, so no perfect shots of them with their son. Although, the one in my gallery is a lot better, what do you think?


To love this comment, log in above
September 26, 2005

 

Jeff Dadey
  Natalie,

Was there anyone around you smoking? Just a thought.

Jeff


To love this comment, log in above
September 26, 2005

 

Kimberly J. Whipps
  Have you ever considered that the bride really is a ghost?


:)


To love this comment, log in above
September 26, 2005

 

anonymous
  Jeff - nope no one was smoking, to her left was the river, I just think it is really strange that only THE BRIDE is ghosted, like she was put into the photo afterwards from a badly exposed shot.....


To love this comment, log in above
September 26, 2005

 

Melissa Farnsworth
  I don't know to think either. But your photos in your gallery are wonderful. Both weddings look beautiful!


To love this comment, log in above
September 26, 2005

 

anonymous
  Thanks Mel, I am glad I was able to save the photo! and it wasn't even RAW.


To love this comment, log in above
September 26, 2005

 

Liza M. Franco
  Hey Natalie, your fellow Bon Jovi fan here. I don't know what caused it, but I'm pretty sure I can fix it. If you want to email it to me I'll see what I can do. Lately I've had a lot of people asking me how to do work in Photoshop and with the cds coming out soon I really don't have time to type out pages of instructions. I try when I can, but I'm pushing deadline on the template cds.

However, I would be happy to work on it for you. It should only take a day. Wedding shots are important and I know how stressful they can be.

Take care,
Liza
http://www.orgsites.com/nc/lizafrancophotography/


To love this comment, log in above
September 26, 2005

 

anonymous
  Oh Liza, you are a darling! Although, check out my gallery, I have fixed it, but only in B&W. I found his skin being really red and her's being pale was really hard, even with other shots I have done. What do you think of the one I have fixed? I don't think they will notice.

So, have you bought the new Jovi CD? Going to the concerts?


To love this comment, log in above
September 26, 2005

 

Liza M. Franco
  Great Job Natalie. Turning to B & W can definitely turn them into keepers.

Haven't bought any new cds in a long time. As far as I know they aren't even coming to my area. I watched some big tribute on an award show for them though and thought of all of us with our old hair dos and had a good laugh. Sharing those pics was a lot of fun.


To love this comment, log in above
September 26, 2005

 

Samuel Smith
  i don't know any camera out there that could cover that exposure latitude with what was there.
sam


To love this comment, log in above
September 26, 2005

 

Melissa L. Zavadil
  That is really really weird! I have never seen anything like that. Maybe you could of had a fingerprint on the lens and the sun was hitting it just right??? I don't know?? Kinda spooky though!!


To love this comment, log in above
September 26, 2005

 

anonymous
  Sam its called Photoshop and Layers! LOL. That is why I can't see the point of shooting in raw, when you get a stuff up like this and I am still able to fix it in tiff or jpeg!


To love this comment, log in above
September 26, 2005

 

Pat Wimpee
  Natalie, Those shots are gorgeous!! I don't know what caused the problem but I don't think they would ever notice in your BW version. And the other shots are beautiful. Great job


To love this comment, log in above
September 26, 2005

 

Michelle Andersson
  Hey there! Something similar just happened to me the other day on a shoot. It was due to flair from the sun. Once I shaded my lens all was well again. Maybe that's what happened to you??


To love this comment, log in above
September 27, 2005

 

Christopher A. Vedros
  Natalie,
I would bet it was a partially fogged lens. Humidity is a major fact of life down here in the South, so I have many examples like this.

Chris


To love this comment, log in above
September 27, 2005

 

anonymous
  Hi all, thanks for the responses. I bet it was fogged too, cause it definitely wasn't sun glare, as we had 100% cloud cover that day.

I much appreciate all your help. I am just glad I was able to fix the photo.


To love this comment, log in above
September 27, 2005

 

Samuel Smith
  star wars,photoshop.it's all science fiction to me.i still haven't learned my camera well enough to not get bad shots?and I don't shoot in the raw.bad rumor?i think that was kerry?
sam


To love this comment, log in above
September 27, 2005

 

Kathy L. Pollick
  Natalie & Liza - not to change the subject, but did you know that Bon Jovi & Sugarland were on Crossroads on CMT last night? Awesome concert!!! Country meets rock & roll!!!

Also, very strange photo. Hard to believe the fog would isolate over the bride only. Glad the other shots came out ok.


To love this comment, log in above
September 28, 2005

 

Kip T. Berger
  Hi Natalie,
When the shot was taken, did you have your eye to the viewfinder? If not, did you remember to cover the eyepiece if using remote trigger? Sometimes stray light entering vieewfinder will cause hotspots within your shot. Just a thought.


To love this comment, log in above
September 28, 2005

 

Forrest C. Wilkinson
  Natalie,

This certainly isn't fog. For one, fog isolates itself to a center-point and then fades inwards. Your problem is isolated on the side of the frame and does not affect the focus on the frame, which tells me that it isn't a condensation fog, and the eyes would not loose their color simply because there is a blotch of fog on the lens. Try it yourself, breath on a window, look through it; what do you see? Of course, A) the focus of your eye is off, and B) the colors are, if anything, enhanced, not diminished. Your lens would not have been able to focus on the bride with the fog on the lens, it would simply be blurry and look "wet". Plus, I assume you look through the viewfinder (at least I hope), you would have definitely seen if you had any fog on the lens. What you have here is a case of excess UV rays hitting the sensor at a certain spot. Note that it could have been completely overcase, it makes no difference. My guess would be that light entered through the viewfinder, and hit the sensor after reflecting off of the glass on the lens. Make sure that the viewfinder is completely covered when you take the picture, it is apparent that you were shooting down when you took this picture, which only increases this light. Now if it wasn't the light, then I would say that you have a small piece of dirt on the back-most piece of glass on your lens and this appears to be very large when it is not focused on. But I highly doubt it was fog. Hope this helps!


To love this comment, log in above
September 28, 2005

 

John G. Clifford Jr
  I've had this happen when bringing a camera from an A/C interior to a hot, humid yard. It takes a few minutes for the lens to warm up and until that time you can get some slight condensation. It's not always even because the outside sun can warm up portions of the lens removing the fogging unevenly.

The solution is to look at your camera from the front when doing this, and don't take pictures for a few minutes after going outside into heat and humidity from an air-conditioned building.


To love this comment, log in above
September 30, 2005

 
This old forum is now archived. Use improved Forum here

Report this Thread