 BetterPhoto Member |
signiture Should I sign my photos? I was thinking it might be distracting. Let me know Thanks Sue
|
|
|
|
||
StoneHorseStudios.com - Eric Highfield Contact Eric Highfield Eric Highfield's Gallery |
I don't think there is any right answer to that. For limited edition prints, some people sign and number the matting and others do it right on the print itself. Personally I stamp the back of open edition prints with a customized stamp with the StoneHorse Studios name & logo over the words "Authorized & Authentic", and I leave it at that. Getting the stamp cost me all of $30 cdn, so it wasn't a huge expense. I had a second stamp made for limited edition prints that had a line for title, print number, and signature, for which I'll stamp the back of the print and add in the print #, title and signature by hand. I'll also provide a corresponding certificate of authenticity with a logo impression seal (the sealer cost me about $60 cdn), and also will sign the print or mat upon request. This system works for me, but again, it’s a matter of personal taste. Just remember to use archival pens and ink pads!!
|
|
|
|
||
|
Doug Elliott |
I agree with StoneHorse Studios. But, I sign all my work when it leaves. I want people to know who the artist is that created that image. Just like Monet, and Renoir people want to know which photographer produced the work. Doug
|
|
|
|
||
|
This old forum is now archived. Use improved Forum here
Report this Thread |
||