Andrew Laverghetta |
Kodak Easyshare Pics as Big as Advertised?
|
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Diane Dupuis |
I also have a 3.2 megapixel camera - not the Kodak but a Fuji. But it's the number of megapixels that counts, I believe. I have successfully printed up to 11 x 14 (even though a digital "pro" told me to forget it - you'll never be able to!). He was rather shocked when my print did well at the camera club competition - he couldn't believe I had taken it with a 3.1. Anyhow, I think not all pictures will be able to blow up to that size. It depends on the subject and overall composition. If you look in my gallery I printed Yummy and Under Mom's protection with no problems. You should be able to get a decent 8 x 10. You could try Neat Image (it's a free program you can download off the internet) which helps clean up digital noise. Good luck!
|
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Andrew Laverghetta |
Wow! Thanks! That picture looks a whole lot better than it did before! I'll go ahead and recommend that program to anybody else I think may need it. Once again, thanks!
|
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Diane Dupuis |
Glad it worked, Andrew! Be sure to shoot your pics at the highest setting too. That will help! Happy shooting!
|
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Dorothy Neumann |
Hi Andrew. I also have a 3.2 MP camera and want to enlarge images bigger than 8x10 for our local camera club. I downloaded Irfanview (it's free). With this I can enlarge images and maintain 250 to 300 ppi for printing. So far, so good.
|
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
John Gasawski |
Andrew: Check your resolution for printing. Should be at least 200 bpi and 300 would be better. It may be that the image you are viewing on the monitor is at 72 bpi. Just a thought. John Gasawski
|
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
This old forum is now archived. Use improved Forum here
Report this Thread |