 Gagan S. Matharoo |
Canon 50 mm lens HI I am planning to buy a 50 mm lens for use with a Canon 7D and a 5D Mark III Which one would be better the 50 mm 1.8 or the 1.4 Do let me know Thanks
|
|
|
|
||
|
Susan Williams |
The 1.4 is more expensive and worth the money because of its solid build compared to the 1.8. Both are great in low-light and you'll learn a lot about creative in-camera composition. The 1.8 is a decent lens, but I upgraded to the 1.4 and don't regret it. Reading the reviews on Amazon should be of some help in deciding.
|
|
|
|
||
|
Grant A. Bergmann |
I'd suggest you consider a zoom like the 24 to 105mm or a 28 to 135mm. They are a lot more versatile unless you have a specific use in mind. Of course they are more expensive.
|
|
|
|
||
|
Ian Cassell |
I think the Canon 50/1.8 is one of the best bargains on the planet. It is inexpensive, light, small, and has terrific IQ. Of course the 1.4 is a quality lens but, unless you need that extra aperture, you'll be very happy with the 1.8. If you can find a Version I of the 1.8, it was made more durable with more metal in the construction, but it tends to be a bit more pricey on the used market than a new Version II.
|
|
|
|
||
|
Mary Iacofano |
I bought the sigma 50mm prime lens. Use it on my canon 30D. great lens, lightweight, luv it.
|
|
|
|
||
|
Vanessa M. Lee |
I have a 5D markiii and really like the 50mm 1.8 but have not tried the 1.4 for comparison. I also have the 24-105 and use it all the time with excellent results from everything to landscapes to portraits.
|
|
|
|
||
|
This old forum is now archived. Use improved Forum here
Report this Thread |
||