My Silent Place
Uploaded: June 23, 2008
This is a redo of "Girl without a Pearl Earring". I made changes after receiving Bill and Johns comments. I added a reflection the eyes, to add more life to them, I lightened the eye sockets using the dodge tool, reshaped the face, defined the hill in the background, and added the tree for more interest. I was going for an old cracked oil painting look.
ISO 200 - f4.5 - 1/60sec.
Chuck S. Frizzell June 23, 2008
6/14/2008 12:13:18 AMmember since: 11/6/2006 Love it!
Excellent. Specially the colors and the PP effects. Great light also makes it very original.
6/14/2008 6:38:42 AM
Daiana Kelly
Contact Daiana
Daiana's Gallery
member since: 5/27/2007 Very well done and beautiful!
6/14/2008 6:41:55 PM
Melissa Gurdus
Contact Melissa
Melissa's Premium Gallery
gurdusphoto.com
member since: 11/24/2005 Beautiful portrait with great artistic effects, Chuck!!
6/16/2008 8:18:17 PM
Chuck S. Frizzell
Contact Chuck
Chuck's Gallery
member since: 5/16/2008 Thanks All, The lighting was the tricky part. The old paintings seem to have distinct shadow areas, and I tryed to capture that.
6/18/2008 11:24:11 AM
Colleen Farrell
Contact Colleen
Colleen's Premium Gallery
colleenfarrell.com
member since: 4/13/2004 Wonderful lighting and effects, Chuck! She even looks a bit like Scarlett Johannsen in the movie.
6/18/2008 10:19:55 PM
John C. Martin
Contact John
John's Premium Gallery
member since: 8/31/2007 Nice portrait but the eyes are a little dead, maybe a small catch light in them to pop a little. A litte less light on the front half of the face, short loop from the back side to the front instead front to back. The expression is a perfect fit for the mood.
6/20/2008 2:09:58 PM
William Schuette
Contact William
William's Premium Gallery
wlsphoto.com
member since: 9/8/2006 Hi Chuck, I think you really captured the effect well but your lighting needs some work. Particularly because the effect seems to emphasize shadow. The dark eye sockets, hair highlight and neck shadow idicate that the light was mainly overhead. The type of look you were going for lends itself to a more Rembrandt-style lighting. Think about a directional light coming from the left of the photo at about 45 degrees and a reflector on the other side. This will open up the neck, eye socket and chin shadows. Also, I like the position of the left border but the photo could use some more space on the right. Finally, I don't know what that big dark mass in the lower right corner is and that makes it very distracting. I also agree with John that the eyes need some catchlights.
Bill
6/20/2008 2:54:19 PM
#947562
Chuck S. Frizzell June 23, 2008
Thanks to John and Bill, I made some changes to my first post(See attached).Nadya Johnson June 25, 2008
Excellent portrait, Chuck! After looking at these two, I prefer the first but w/o the tree. Mind you, if you study old paintings of the era I believe you were going for, you will find all SORTS of oddities half-hidden in the backgrounds, up to and including what appear to be UFO's!! So technically, I think the tree back there would be historically correct. My only trouble with it is, it distracts the eye a bit I think, drawing attention from the eyes to the mouth instead.Either way, outstanding work on this! I enjoyed your gallery very much - and by the way, also like your cartoon mini-pic! #6106532
Chuck S. Frizzell June 25, 2008
Nadya, Thank you for your comment. Your right they always had some obscure objects in the background. So it's nice that you figured out why I put the tree back there. I tried it higher, closer to eye level, but it just didn't look right. I may take it out all together, but then there would be no oddity. #6107260Chuck S. Frizzell June 26, 2008
Thanks for the comment, Deborah. #6111803Joan E. Hoffman June 27, 2008
Very nice work on this Chuck. Love the softness and the texture! #6114576Chuck S. Frizzell June 27, 2008
Thank you Joan. #6114939Kathleen Rinker June 28, 2008
Excellent, love your PS work, great work!! #6117964Chuck S. Frizzell June 28, 2008
Kathleen, thank you for the kind comment. #6117989Aggie Villanueva June 28, 2008
I think you've done a fabulous job with this. Now can you print it out on stretched canvas to complete the look?!!! I enjoyed reading all the comments because I learned from this. Thankx for that. #6118824Chuck S. Frizzell July 07, 2008
Thank you Aggie, your comments are always so wonderful. I have a 13"x19" printer with roll canvas I'm going to use to print it. #6150281Sign up for an interactive online photography course to get critiques on your photos.
Discussions by Category: You can view photo discussions on various themes in the Community > Photo Discussions section of the site.
BetterPhoto Websites: If you see an orange website link directly under the photographer's name, it's totally okay. It's not spam. The reason: BetterPhoto is the one that offers these personal photography websites. We are supporting our clients with those links.
Unavailable EXIF: If there is no other information but 'Unavailable' in the EXIF (meaning no EXIF data exists with the photo), the 'Unavailable' blurb is not displayed. If there is any info, it shows. Many photos have the EXIF stripped out when people modify the image and resave it, before uploading.
The following truth is one of the core philosophies of BetterPhoto:
I hear, I forget.
I see, I remember.
I do, I understand.
You learn by doing. Take your next online photography class.
Copyright for this photo belongs solely to Chuck S. Frizzell.
Images may not be copied, downloaded, or used in any way without the expressed, written permission of the photographer.
Log in to follow or message this photographer or report this photo.
I already have an account!