Turquoise Thunder #2

© Michael S. Lazarus

Turquoise Thunder #2

Uploaded: March 09, 2008


f/5.6, 1/2000, 70-300mmVR@300mm, DSC_9359, 7:43AM, ISO400

O.K. my "Breaking News" photo was a big success. Problem is how do you follow that up?................... You go look for it's big brother. You get wet. You take bigger risks. You see what I'm talking about? I got up on a cold (50 something degrees which in Miami is cold) and windy Sunday morning and went out in that South Beach surf with my baby and got busy just for you guys. Hope you enjoy these NC POV's (Nut Case POV's).............. and keep the donations coming (Joe's Camera repair loves me).

Exif: F Number: 5.6, Exposure Bias Value: 0.00, ExposureTime: 1/2000 seconds, Flash: did not fire., ISO: 400, White balance: Auto white balance, FocalLength: 300.00 mm, Model: NIKON D40


Aimee C. Eisaman March 10, 2008

This is very pretty Michael yet it seems a tad off balance to me in the composition. Seems very bottom heavy. I think (and of course my HO) that a tad less bottom of the wave and a bit more over the top of the wave would be nice. Maybe if you turned this one into a panorama type crop? Just a thought. The colors are lovely and the cripness of the crest is refreshing. It does have a nice feel to it! It was worth the risk! #874053

Joan E. Hoffman March 12, 2008

Michael.. I have looked at these three several times over the past couple of days trying to decide which one I liked best... first of all... I love all three, secondly it becomes a right brain, left brain thing. If I remember correctly right brain is the practical side, left is the artistic... So... being an accounting type... I use right brain primarily. However, also having a strong, left brain part... I am not necessarily always looking at detail when it comes to photography, I tend to react from emotion. Thus... I like this one best... it just captures my eye. Love the colours, the action, and it pleases me for no particular reason. (and btw... if I mixed up the left right brain bit... just reverse it LOL) #5634897

Joan E. Hoffman March 12, 2008

Oh and btw... technically speaking (from a rank 0) I disagree with Aimee on this one... I think less top and more bottom would please my eye ~S~ Dont't get rid of the wave just crop it down so that just the surge from the bottom is present perhaps? #5634909

To discuss, first log in or sign up (buttons are at top center of page).

Get Constructive Critiques

Sign up for an interactive online photography course to get critiques on your photos.


Did You Know?

Discussions by Category: You can view photo discussions on various themes in the Community > Photo Discussions section of the site.

BetterPhoto Websites: If you see an orange website link directly under the photographer's name, it's totally okay. It's not spam. The reason: BetterPhoto is the one that offers these personal photography websites. We are supporting our clients with those links.

Unavailable EXIF: If there is no other information but 'Unavailable' in the EXIF (meaning no EXIF data exists with the photo), the 'Unavailable' blurb is not displayed. If there is any info, it shows. Many photos have the EXIF stripped out when people modify the image and resave it, before uploading.


The following truth is one of the core philosophies of BetterPhoto:

I hear, I forget.
I see, I remember.
I do, I understand.

You learn by doing. Take your next online photography class.

BetterPhoto.com Editor's Pick

Copyright for this gallery photo belongs solely to Michael S. Lazarus.
Images may not be copied, downloaded, or used in any way without the expressed, written permission of the photographer.
Log in to follow or message this photographer or report this photo.