Ferrari Model
Uploaded: December 29, 2006
Made in studio with one of my lighting classes. 4X5 film original.
Exif: FNumber: , ExposureBiasValue: , ExposureTime: , Flash: , ISO: , WhiteBalance:
Laura E. Swan May 03, 2008
Hi John! I was just reading this thread again and enjoying where we first met! :) I forgot that it was you that had posted this Ferrari. Somehow David Pratt or Steve came to mind. Smiled when I realized!HP didn't advise me when more comments to this thread had arrived so I am just reading the rest now...
So, you like the smell of dark room chems do you? Well they do have an aroma all their own!
Time to go read the rest of the thread. Just wanted to say, "Hello"!
Time for you to add another shot on the ~DRU~ site, don't you think!? -Laura Swan #914334
John H. Siskin May 04, 2008
Hi Laura,I do miss the darkroom, but I will have a new darkroom soon. There is something about a handmade print that is incredibly satisfying.
Could you remind me of what the DRU site is?
Thanks for noticing my images. I really appreciate it!
Thanks! John Siskin
#5882534
Laura E. Swan May 04, 2008
Hi Steve,What is a fill card? Something white or black to bounce or stop the light off of? (You did a great job on the lighting by the way. Kinda looks like a street light is shining down on the car.)
Loved the idea for the base. Creative!
I know what you mean about a hand made print. There's such a huge excitement and satisfaction there when you get it just right or create something, (in my case), unexpected! Ha! I bet in a way you are sad that the digital age is here and so huge. A day might come when hardly anyone even knows what an f stop is. :(
I have to admit I love digitals because I don't have to waste a pile of money on film anymore to get the RIGHT SHOT!
Although I don't feel digitals are quite there yet with quality, (not 100%), I have seen magazine covers etc., that use them now, and they did look great. I think one had used an older camera....like a Nikon D1X, or something. 5.4 mega pix?...It was a while ago. National Geo Mag...I don't keep up on that sort of thing really.
The DRU club stands for:
Discussions R Us
How funny! You must be in a pile of clubs?! I am in 4 now and it's hard to keep up.
Enjoy your day.
Your new photo friend, Laura #5882904
John H. Siskin May 04, 2008
Hi Laura,A fill card is a piece of white board that is used to bounce light back into the image. If you use a simple piece of white board you get a soft light source that is much lower in power than the original light source. It is important to use the fill card close to the subject. Keeping it away from the subject can make it so low in reflectance that you don’t see it.
I have done a lot of magazine work, some with digital and some with film. Frankly I don’t see that digital is inferior in a full page size. I have a camera with more than 13 megapixels, and you would need to make a print at least 16X20 from a 4X5 negative to see an improvement in film over digital.
Thanks, John Siskin
#5883147
Laura E. Swan May 04, 2008
Hi again Steve!Wow! 12 clubs? I'd join your S.T.A.T.C. club if I thought I had anything to contribute! Ha! Maybe one day.
Thanks for the explanation of fill card. Very interesting. I will remember this.
I was surprised to read how much digital is being used for mags now. Looks like digital is gaining speed.
My National Geo books date back. That might have been like a 2004 issue or something! Ha!
We have out of town company coming tomorrow from Australia. I'd better get serious about getting the house in order. They will be using the shower no doubt! Eek! Glad they wont have MICRO CAMERAS on them! Ha!
Fun chatting. -Laura #5883692
John H. Siskin May 04, 2008
Hi Laura,Digital is being used for most work these days, and all the work I do. It is quicker, with better feedback and the costs are lower. Though I love film, you can’t argue against digital.
Thanks, John Siskin
#5883969
Laura E. Swan May 04, 2008
I have only written your name a dozen times and it IS on the side of the thread...So sorry, BILL. Ha! Just kiddin'.You can call me Margaret ANY TIME YOU LIKE!
Back to cleaning! Sorry about that one! #5884169
John H. Siskin May 04, 2008
Thanks Margaret! #5884384Laura E. Swan May 04, 2008
You're welcome, Sam. #5884424Sign up for an interactive online photography course to get critiques on your photos.
Discussions by Category: You can view photo discussions on various themes in the Community > Photo Discussions section of the site.
BetterPhoto Websites: If you see an orange website link directly under the photographer's name, it's totally okay. It's not spam. The reason: BetterPhoto is the one that offers these personal photography websites. We are supporting our clients with those links.
Unavailable EXIF: If there is no other information but 'Unavailable' in the EXIF (meaning no EXIF data exists with the photo), the 'Unavailable' blurb is not displayed. If there is any info, it shows. Many photos have the EXIF stripped out when people modify the image and resave it, before uploading.
The following truth is one of the core philosophies of BetterPhoto:
I hear, I forget.
I see, I remember.
I do, I understand.
You learn by doing. Take your next online photography class.
Copyright for this photo belongs solely to John H. Siskin.
Images may not be copied, downloaded, or used in any way without the expressed, written permission of the photographer.
Log in to follow or message this photographer or report this photo.
I already have an account!