December Sunset in Elsa village IL.
Uploaded: January 02, 2014
Dale Hardin January 02, 2014
Beautiful mid-west scene, Peter, with a nice composition.Impossible of course, for me to tell what it looked like, but my impression is that it would benefit from a white balance adjustment and high light reduction. This is the look I used to get from my old Polaroid. Very distinctive. Not wrong, just different. #1557959
Peter W. Marks January 02, 2014
Thank you Dale. What you are seeing is a Topaz Lab Detail v.3 adjustment using the "Stylized Detail Collection, Summer landscape" plugin. The original was rather lifeless and bland.Dale Hardin January 02, 2014
I appreciate you taking care of that. You know how it does weird things to me. :o) #10935570Jeff E Jensen January 02, 2014
Does weird things to Dale. . . . .I like the placement of the light on the steeple, Peter. The only thing that bothers me is the bits of trees coming into the frame on the left side. With not being anchored to anything, they look out of place. I know, they were there when you shot them, but they still look out of place. If they were attached to a trunk, I'd be okay. But, as it is, they need to go and should be simple to clone out. #10935644
Susan Williams January 03, 2014
Peter, I really like the lighting in this image and the quaint feel to the scene. I am partial to the mid-west love the Americana feel to this image. I agree with Jeff that the upper branches in the upper third on the left could be cloned out, but I don't don't see them as a flaw in the composition. If you lose them, you might find the sky too plain so it pulls the other way. I'd try it to see. Beautiful work, as is, though. #10935950Peter W. Marks January 03, 2014
Of course it does weird things to you Dale. But I have developed a theory about your OCD regarding tilted horizons.lolSusan Williams January 03, 2014
The big tree creates shadows on the Church. I like the framing of the branches. #10936399Beth Spencer January 03, 2014
I like the way the light is hitting the front of the church and the shadows from the trees. I like the branches cloaned out.Kalena Randall January 03, 2014
I like the affect the Topaz software you used on this created, Peter. I also like the crop of removing the trees on the one side.I agree with you that shots like this with are sometimes flat. I really like the pp that you did.
:-)
#10936426
Michael Kelly January 03, 2014
Very nice Peter. I understand the desire to remove the disembodied branches, but to me it looks a bit empty without them. I think that the steeple in the sun is awfully bright so would support Dale’s suggestion of a slight highlight reduction. #10936459Peter W. Marks January 04, 2014
There is no good reason why we all should agree on anything but it does intrigue me how with many images some will say 'clone something out' and others say 'leave it in'. But what I do particularly appreciate is when the responder tells us 'why' as Mike has just done regarding the branches, as that helps us understand the thinking. As for the over-bright steeple; I had reduced that just a little from the out of camera shot but decided only to bring it back just enough to show the ventilation louvres to give it form but to leave the overall brightness to emphasize at this Christmas time that Christ's birth theologically is pointing forward to Easter and His sacrifice on the cross. Not everyone's thing I understand, but blessings to you all. #10936693Elaine Hessler January 04, 2014
Really pretty shot, Peter. I cannot decide which one I like better. I keep going back and forth. At first I liked the one without the branches-it has a completely different look-a lot more space and you can focus in on the church. But then I keep going back to the one with the branches, and like the way they take up some of the sky on the left. #10937242Jeff E Jensen January 04, 2014
I like it without the branches, Peter! #10937459Sign up for an interactive online photography course to get critiques on your photos.
Discussions by Category: You can view photo discussions on various themes in the Community > Photo Discussions section of the site.
BetterPhoto Websites: If you see an orange website link directly under the photographer's name, it's totally okay. It's not spam. The reason: BetterPhoto is the one that offers these personal photography websites. We are supporting our clients with those links.
Unavailable EXIF: If there is no other information but 'Unavailable' in the EXIF (meaning no EXIF data exists with the photo), the 'Unavailable' blurb is not displayed. If there is any info, it shows. Many photos have the EXIF stripped out when people modify the image and resave it, before uploading.
The following truth is one of the core philosophies of BetterPhoto:
I hear, I forget.
I see, I remember.
I do, I understand.
You learn by doing. Take your next online photography class.
Copyright for this photo belongs solely to Peter W. Marks.
Images may not be copied, downloaded, or used in any way without the expressed, written permission of the photographer.
Log in to follow or message this photographer or report this photo.
I already have an account!