Lower Yosemite Falls

© Stephen Shoff

Lower Yosemite Falls

Uploaded: March 21, 2013

Description

f10.0, 1/500 sec, ISO 400, -0.67 exp comp; EF 24-70 f/2.8L@70mm

Lower Yosemite Falls, Yosemite National Park, CA

Exif: F Number: 10, Exposure Bias Value: -0.67, ExposureTime: 1/500 seconds, Flash: did not fire, compulsory flash mode, ISO: 400, White balance: Manual white balance, FocalLength: 70.00 mm, Model: Canon EOS 5D Mark II

Comments

Stephen Shoff March 21, 2013

I'd forgotten I took these. It was my last walk back from Yosemite Village to Yosemite Lodge before I headed home that Sunday morning. #1520212

Dale Hardin March 21, 2013

Nice detail and rainbow Stephen. Did you use the NEX on this shot? #10618659

Stephen Shoff March 21, 2013

Thanks, Dale. No, this was taken using my 5DMII. #10618980

Rita K. Connell level-classic March 22, 2013

a new day starting out seeing a rainbow what more could you ask for... if this was my image I would do a little select saturation on the green trees and brighten them up a little. #10619606

Anthony L. Mancuso March 22, 2013

I like the image overall, but I don't think the rainbow works well compostionally and prefer the mono version...I would just open up the shadows a tad.. #10619623

Jeff E Jensen March 23, 2013

Excellent, Stephen! The more you show us of this place, the more I want to get there. #10620861

lisa anderson March 24, 2013

I'm so-so about the rainbow in the small version, but I really like it in the full-screen version. I bet this shot would be fantastic blown up. #10621846

Peter W. Marks March 24, 2013

And I can't make up my mind which I prefer but am slightly in favor of the mono version.
#10622184

Stephen Shoff March 24, 2013

I'm not overly sold on waterfall rainbow pictures either. This particular morning it seemed like I caught them just right. Of the several that I have, I liked this one best although I have others with more rainbow in them. I agree, too, that this image loses a lot in screen size. We really need a way to present full monitor size images -- I would expect at least HD dimensions (1920x1080 DPI). It can really change the character of an image.

This time, I'll probably not work these more. I've got several others that I want to post in the next several days.

Thanks for your comments. #10622770


To discuss, first log in or sign up (buttons are at top center of page).

Get Constructive Critiques

Sign up for an interactive online photography course to get critiques on your photos.


 

Did You Know?

Discussions by Category: You can view photo discussions on various themes in the Community > Photo Discussions section of the site.

BetterPhoto Websites: If you see an orange website link directly under the photographer's name, it's totally okay. It's not spam. The reason: BetterPhoto is the one that offers these personal photography websites. We are supporting our clients with those links.

Unavailable EXIF: If there is no other information but 'Unavailable' in the EXIF (meaning no EXIF data exists with the photo), the 'Unavailable' blurb is not displayed. If there is any info, it shows. Many photos have the EXIF stripped out when people modify the image and resave it, before uploading.


 

The following truth is one of the core philosophies of BetterPhoto:

I hear, I forget.
I see, I remember.
I do, I understand.

You learn by doing. Take your next online photography class.


Copyright for this photo belongs solely to Stephen Shoff.
Images may not be copied, downloaded, or used in any way without the expressed, written permission of the photographer.
Log in to follow or message this photographer or report this photo.