Untitled
Uploaded: December 03, 2012
Exif: F Number: 5, Exposure Bias Value: 0.00, ExposureTime: 1/100 seconds, Flash: did not fire, compulsory flash mode, ISO: 250, White balance: Auto white balance, FocalLength: 85.00 mm, Model: Canon EOS REBEL T2i
Rita K. Connell December 03, 2012
ok I am not sure how I feel about this one Brandi. I like the idea, I think them kissing just not cropped in the middle of thier faces. it takes away from why I need to save that date. then the other distraction I am finding is in the clip on the sign and hand on the left, and then the light stops on the gentleman pants between his legs I would clone thoses out. #1501681Stephen Shoff December 03, 2012
So this is why I don't comment on people and wedding submissions. I would have taken this at face value -- someone's cute (I mean that as a compliment) idea for a wedding announcement and left it at that. These days, "There are no rules"! Right? I was even sympathetic to the crop.I takes someone more attuned to these things to suggest whether or not all these items that would be true in landscape or architecture image are really significant in this one. #10448968
Dale Hardin December 03, 2012
A very cute idea Brandi and a with good focus and lighting.I do wish though, that I could see the faces so I'd know who was making the request. The other items are not issues for me. #10449127
Elaine Hessler December 03, 2012
Hi Brandi-I really like the idea of this, but I have to agree with Rita-the cropped faces really bother me. Not sure why-maybe because they seem to be anonymous, and they shouldn't be. I thnk this would be adorable if you have a shot that includes their heads. Very creative idea though! #10449303Michael Kelly December 03, 2012
I guess I am to old fassioned for this to work for me. A number of minor issues but having the faces cut off is a show stopper. #10449321Teresa H. Hunt December 03, 2012
So Mike do you mean show stopper in a good way or a bad way?I really like this shot Brandi. I've seen these types of photos before, where the couples faces are cropped and they work. However I think the placement of the crop here is what's causing the problem. Their kiss is crowded at the very top of the frame. I think a smidge more room would help with the effect you're going for. :) #10449475
Brandi K. Mills December 03, 2012
The cropping off of heads was actually the brides request. Wondered what you all would think. #10449510Michael Kelly December 03, 2012
One of the reasons I don't do these kind of shoots, but if that is what the client wants... #10449521Peter W. Marks December 04, 2012
It's original and probably has no purpose other than to remind friends and family of the wedding date so I guess it works. Shame about the faces. It might be one of my nieces so she will have to forgive me when I don't send a gift. #10450390Brandi K. Mills December 04, 2012
The mystery is revealed!Beth Spencer December 04, 2012
I like the idea, but want to see the faces. #10450826Brandi K. Mills December 04, 2012
Oops! The pictures I posted earlier didn't show up. #10450906Elaine Hessler December 04, 2012
Oh my gosh what a cute couple! WHY would they want their faces cut off? I love these pictures. I think on the second photo their faces may be overexposed, but other than that, I really do like them a lot:) #10450926Dale Hardin December 04, 2012
I agree with Elaine, they are a lovely couple that should never hide their faces. That second shot is beautiful. #10451052Michael Kelly December 04, 2012
Ah, much better at least for me. Don't know why she would want one without faces as the look like a great couple. #10451089Jeff E Jensen December 04, 2012
Hey, if that's what the client wants, that's what the client wants. . . .Personally, I prefer the un-cropped version. #10451232
Rita K. Connell December 05, 2012
clients always win but agree with Teresa that maybe its where the crop is... for not showing thier faces,that is the problem. a 7x5 crop right below his chin works well #10452212Debbie E. Payne December 05, 2012
Brandi I am really late to the party. Hopefully, by next week, I will be on my way to being "normal" again or whatever that means!! It's pretty much already be said and I am in the camp where we like to see faces not cut off. But it's not your fault if that is what the couple asked for. Yikes, another reason why I'm not a portrait photographer. What were they thinking? I might have suggested photographing them from behind with the signs propped in front of their backsides -- but it would have been with the backs of their heads totally in the shot - probably leaning into each other with their heads touching. #10452735Sign up for an interactive online photography course to get critiques on your photos.
Discussions by Category: You can view photo discussions on various themes in the Community > Photo Discussions section of the site.
BetterPhoto Websites: If you see an orange website link directly under the photographer's name, it's totally okay. It's not spam. The reason: BetterPhoto is the one that offers these personal photography websites. We are supporting our clients with those links.
Unavailable EXIF: If there is no other information but 'Unavailable' in the EXIF (meaning no EXIF data exists with the photo), the 'Unavailable' blurb is not displayed. If there is any info, it shows. Many photos have the EXIF stripped out when people modify the image and resave it, before uploading.
The following truth is one of the core philosophies of BetterPhoto:
I hear, I forget.
I see, I remember.
I do, I understand.
You learn by doing. Take your next online photography class.
Copyright for this photo belongs solely to Brandi K. Mills.
Images may not be copied, downloaded, or used in any way without the expressed, written permission of the photographer.
Log in to follow or message this photographer or report this photo.
I already have an account!