Abstract Orbs
Uploaded: September 14, 2005
Exif: FNumber: 5, ExposureBiasValue: 0/1, ExposureTime: 0.0125, Flash: flash did not fire, ISO: 100, WhiteBalance:
Kevin Nugent September 16, 2005
Very nice! Good detail and it looks cool in greyscale! #311795A C September 16, 2005
This is great! I like this in gray as well. There is good contrast but the whites aren't blown out and there is good detail all around. Bravo! #1847005Andrew Laverghetta September 16, 2005
Thanks Kevin and Cherylann! This reminds me that I meant to write how I converted this to black and white. I used channel mixer in Photoshop CS, clicked monochrome and adjusted the red, green, and blue levels until I got it to something dark with some nice contrasting whites. Originally, it was the washed out underside of a sugar maple leaf with the water on it. It would have been impossible to make the silvery underside look saturated with color so I gave it a new look in black and white. My darkroom photo class has me really excited about black and white so I'm going to try to take some more black and white film pics like this to frame on my wall.Thanks again for commenting! #1847027
A C September 16, 2005
Thank you for mentioning your techniques! I like to work in PS CS a lot but I don't work the channel mixer much. The only photography class I've taken was in the darkroom doing black and white images and I've found that digital black and white isn't as impressive as film black and white if you don't know how to use your software well enough.Enjoy your class! #1847075
Andrew Laverghetta January 17, 2006
Sorry, this is a little late but thanks for the comments! #2298560Andrew Laverghetta April 22, 2006
Thanks for the compliments sidney!I'll look at my file and see which lens it was. Either way, I believe I cropped it a little bit so it seems like it's closer than it really is.
Ok, found it. That's with my 20D so it's already closer with the 1.6x field of view crop. I used a normal 50mm lens at f/5.0 and 1/80second. ISO was 100. Normally, that wouldn't get me any exceptionally close photos but I used at least one close up filter. That's basically just a magnifying glass that screws on to the front of the lens like a filter. I don't know what kind of camera you're using since you don't have a gallery with photos in it, but you may or may not be able to do this with your camera. Something that has satisfied my close up craving enough for now has been those close up filters. I can never remember the real name of them but they normally come in +1, +2, or +4 strengths, meaning +4 gets you the closest. You can stack them too, but that normally degrades image quality. So, after I took the picture, I edited it and turned it to black and white using photoshop's channel mixer. Thanks for your interest too! #2675399
Sign up for an interactive online photography course to get critiques on your photos.
Discussions by Category: You can view photo discussions on various themes in the Community > Photo Discussions section of the site.
BetterPhoto Websites: If you see an orange website link directly under the photographer's name, it's totally okay. It's not spam. The reason: BetterPhoto is the one that offers these personal photography websites. We are supporting our clients with those links.
Unavailable EXIF: If there is no other information but 'Unavailable' in the EXIF (meaning no EXIF data exists with the photo), the 'Unavailable' blurb is not displayed. If there is any info, it shows. Many photos have the EXIF stripped out when people modify the image and resave it, before uploading.
The following truth is one of the core philosophies of BetterPhoto:
I hear, I forget.
I see, I remember.
I do, I understand.
You learn by doing. Take your next online photography class.
Copyright for this photo belongs solely to Andrew Laverghetta.
Images may not be copied, downloaded, or used in any way without the expressed, written permission of the photographer.
Log in to follow or message this photographer or report this photo.
I already have an account!