BetterPhoto Q&A
Category: Problems with Images

Photography Question 

Virginia Kickle
 

Sizing for upload to Better Photo


I have noticed that my images loaded to Better Photo do not appear sharp. What settings should I be using when I export them from Lightroom?


To love this question, log in above
March 17, 2014

 
chrisbudny.com - Chris Budny

BetterPhoto Member
Contact Chris Budny
Chris Budny's Gallery
  Speaking from my own experience, after I make all my edits in my full-size file, I make another file just for my BP upload. In my BP file, I re-size it down to 800 pixels on the long edge (sometimes adding additional sharpening at this stage, if the image needs it.) That is the file I then use to upload (never the full-size file) and I've never encountered a perceived softening when I view the uploaded image.


To love this comment, log in above
March 20, 2014

 
BetterPhotoJim.com - Jim Miotke

BetterPhoto Member
BetterPhoto Crew: King
Contact Jim Miotke
Jim Miotke's Gallery
  That is a great procedure, Chris.

I will tell you that I recommend trying it at 1600 px on the long end.

Please, if you have chance, try that out and let me know if it works well for you.

The 1600 will come in very handy in the near future.

Thanks,
Jim


To love this comment, log in above
March 20, 2014

 
- Ken Smith

BetterPhoto Member
Contact Ken Smith
Ken Smith's Gallery
  Hi Jim, I do the same as Chris; always resize to 800. That's because I thought the BP process would take any uploaded image greater than 800 pixels, and downsize them to 800 for display. For example, if I upload an image at 1600 x 1066, the BP process would downsize to 800 x 533. Rather than having the BP process downsize, we just do it ourselves, sharpen, then upload.

Your comment about "1600 will come in very handy in the near future". Reading between the lines, I'm hoping you're saying that soon, BP will allow for the display of images up to 1600 pixels. That would be super! I've seen many great pano shots that lose impact, because of the 800 pixel limitation.

Thanks for chiming in on the forum. Great dialogue!


To love this comment, log in above
March 20, 2014

 
BetterPhotoJim.com - Jim Miotke

BetterPhoto Member
BetterPhoto Crew: King
Contact Jim Miotke
Jim Miotke's Gallery
  Nudge, nudge, wink, wink... wonderful things are in the works :)


To love this comment, log in above
March 20, 2014

 
- Ken Smith

BetterPhoto Member
Contact Ken Smith
Ken Smith's Gallery
  Excellent! Thanks, Jim!


To love this comment, log in above
March 20, 2014

 
- Nikki McDonald

BetterPhoto Member
Contact Nikki McDonald
Nikki McDonald's Gallery
  I know BP images are right click protected, but of course there is no way any site can protect against screen captures. Is a screen capture of an image that was resized to 1600 on the long side any more or less vulnerable to being "borrowed" and used without permission than one that was resized to 800 on the long side?


To love this comment, log in above
March 20, 2014

 
chrisbudny.com - Chris Budny

BetterPhoto Member
Contact Chris Budny
Chris Budny's Gallery
  You'd get a screenshot with 4x the pixels... so someone looking to use/print your images without your consent, from a screengrab, has more data to play with now.
ie, an 800x533 display today, could become a 1600 x 1066 display, if this is one of the new features coming at BP... The 800 grab would yield (at assumed 300dpi printing) 2.6" x 1.8" print. The 1600 grab would yield a 5.3" x 3.5" print. Of course, printing those on a lower-than-300 dpi printer one could end up with potentially even larger, workable print sizes.
I'd guess that if we get to an enhancement allowing say, 1600 pixel display, then many folks will probably want to expand their use of watermark signatures, and run them through the center of the image.


To love this comment, log in above
March 20, 2014

 

Monnie Ryan
  My rule of thumb has been to upload photos at 900 on the long side (and about half that on Facebook) simply because should they be "stolen" the best anybody could get would be a 4 x 6 print, if that. Just for grins I just captured a friend's photo from today (which I've already deleted, of course) that shows at 875 x 579. I resized it to twice that and I'm able to get a decent-sized print. Imagine how good it would be if I'd been able to download it at 1600. Think I'll stick with smaller sizing here just to be on the safe side.


To love this comment, log in above
March 20, 2014

 
- Usman M. Bajwa

BetterPhoto Member
Contact Usman M. Bajwa
Usman M. Bajwa's Gallery
  I also do the same as Chris and Ken explained above, Virginia. I have a question .... will be actual size we see on our monitors will be any different than what we see now? If the size doubles, lets just assume, does it mean we have to scroll each entry to see the complete image, which sometimes is tedious to do and takes the fun out of seeing the image as a whole!

UB.


To love this comment, log in above
March 20, 2014

 
- Ken Smith

BetterPhoto Member
Contact Ken Smith
Ken Smith's Gallery
  Usman, when I first joined BP in 2005, we could display images in their full resolution. Or at least up to 2000 pixels, because I have some that large in my gallery. But the thumbnail was the same size as today, 210 pixels on the large side. So, I don't think BP will change the default size of the thumbnails.


To love this comment, log in above
March 21, 2014

 
- Usman M. Bajwa

BetterPhoto Member
Contact Usman M. Bajwa
Usman M. Bajwa's Gallery
  Sorry for not being very clear, Ken. But my query was actually relating to the full blown image itself and not the thumbnail.

UB.


To love this comment, log in above
March 21, 2014

 
- Ken Smith

BetterPhoto Member
Contact Ken Smith
Ken Smith's Gallery
  Usman, I don't know. I guess we'll just have to see, if/when BP makes the size change. I don't recall it being a big deal when I first joined.


To love this comment, log in above
March 21, 2014

 

Virginia Kickle
  I haven't seen resolution mentioned. Should it be 72 ppi?


To love this comment, log in above
March 21, 2014

 
- Gregory LaGrange

BetterPhoto Member
Contact Gregory LaGrange
Gregory LaGrange's Gallery
  Usman, if the display size is 1600, if you have a wide format monitor than it should fit.


To love this comment, log in above
March 21, 2014

 
BetterPhotoJim.com - Jim Miotke

BetterPhoto Member
BetterPhoto Crew: King
Contact Jim Miotke
Jim Miotke's Gallery
  Hi awesome BetterPhoto members,

The largest images on display will likely be around 1000 px on the long end.

The decision as to how much you do to protect images is up to you. I can only tell you want I do... I size my images to 1600px in case we ever develop the functionality that would allow me to print my images (on paper or in books or on coffee mugs, etc)... or sell such images. I doubt BetterPhoto will do the latter but it may do the former.

If you are concerned about image sizes being so big that thieves will steal your photos, you may opt to downsize the image to 800px on the long end before uploading (or whatever size you want).

The choice is totally up to you.

And yes, Virginia, I still change my image resolution to 72ppi before rechecking the resize checkbox and then set the width or height to what I prefer. In Photoshop, you can use the Fit Image automation (or a few other methods) to get this done while you're making yourself a cup of tea.

Usman, I'm thinking about making the image thumbnails on the gallery index pages a little bigger. I'm talking about pages like: http://www.betterphoto.com/gallery/dynoGall2.php?catID=296&cn=Cute-Babies-and-Baby-Pictures

The overall width is now something like 940px and it might get to be around 1240px.

However, the wonderful news is that, with modern programming, the images will automatically downsize to fit the width of your display.

Ken, for you this means that you'll want to use the highest resolution display and have it full screen, if you want to see as much of those amazing panorama photos as you can.

You will use the scroll to move down a page but not to the right.

The other nice thing about this is that the site is going to look and function much better on iPads, mobile devices, your new Apple watch :) etc.

Thanks!
Jim


To love this comment, log in above
March 22, 2014

 

Virginia Kickle
  Thank you for all the information. My questions were answered! Virginia


To love this comment, log in above
March 22, 2014

 
- Usman M. Bajwa

BetterPhoto Member
Contact Usman M. Bajwa
Usman M. Bajwa's Gallery
  Thanks Jim for the notes. Much appreciated ;)

UB.


To love this comment, log in above
March 22, 2014

 
- Carolyn M. Fletcher

BetterPhoto Member
BetterPhoto Crew: Volunteer
Contact Carolyn M. Fletcher
Carolyn M. Fletcher's Gallery
  I, too, use the 800 on the long side for my uploads, in the Tiff format. I know they will change to Jpg, but they just look better in Tiff, to me. Maybe Jim could weigh in on the Tiff/Jpg thing?


To love this comment, log in above
March 27, 2014

 
BetterPhotoJim.com - Jim Miotke

BetterPhoto Member
BetterPhoto Crew: King
Contact Jim Miotke
Jim Miotke's Gallery
  I would actually love to hear from each of you on this. I myself upload high-quality JPEGs and am very satisfied with the quality and the upload speed is good. But TIFF has worked well for me too.

Reader, what do you do? :)

Any other tips for optimal image quality, anyone?


To love this comment, log in above
March 27, 2014

 
- Nikki McDonald

BetterPhoto Member
Contact Nikki McDonald
Nikki McDonald's Gallery
  Highlighted Comment: I have been fine with mine. I convert tiffs to jpgs when I resize. I resize to 800 on the long side, 72 dpi, in FastStone Image Viewer (free download). Then I sharpen slightly (FS, too). And finally I save as jpg. So as far as I know, the BP software does nothing to my images when I upload.


To love this comment, log in above
March 27, 2014

 
- Ken Smith

BetterPhoto Member
Contact Ken Smith
Ken Smith's Gallery
  Highlighted Comment: Jim, I remember the tips BP gave several years ago...resize to 800 on long side, sharpen, saturate a tad, and convert to TIF.

But I have done experiments comparing images uploaded as TIF and JPG, and can't discern a difference. But years ago, I could. Or maybe it was my imagination.

And I've done experiments uploading an image at 800 pixels and comparing to another image uploaded at 1600 pixels (arbitrary size), and downsized to 800 by BP process. The downsized image was a little degraded visually which I think was the main reason someone at BP recommended that we resize to 800 and sharpen before uploading.

I do look forward to the option of viewing images at a larger pixel count.


To love this comment, log in above
March 27, 2014

 
chrisbudny.com - Chris Budny

BetterPhoto Member
Contact Chris Budny
Chris Budny's Gallery
  800px TIF upload here; although I've never once paid any mind to whatever the DPI setting is. It has no real bearing on web-displayed files; whether you save as 800 pixels wide (at 300dpi), or 800 pixels wide (at 72dpi) or 800 pixels wide (at 10,000dpi), your file still has just 800 pixels across, and that is what will display online. (Try opening a file, resize it to 800 however you normally would, and save it as a TIF. Then go change just the DPI value to a totally different value (with "resample = off") and save it as a differently-named TIF again... the 2 files are both 800 pixels wide, and the same MB in size.)


To love this comment, log in above
March 27, 2014

 
BetterPhotoJim.com - Jim Miotke

BetterPhoto Member
BetterPhoto Crew: King
Contact Jim Miotke
Jim Miotke's Gallery
  Yeah, Ken... JPEGs have become much better than they were in the old days. That's why they might be just as good as TIFF now. Worth a try for anyone who likes testing things out.

And you are totally right, Chris. I just change that ppi to 72 out of mindless habit. :)

It's not really necessary if you are always looking at your image dimensions in the units of pixels (which I always do because I rarely print anymore).

We have such a wonderful BP right around the corner. I am going to see how much the team can get done on it this weekend.

Cra-crack (the sound of whipping).

Have a great weekend.


To love this comment, log in above
March 28, 2014

 
- Nikki McDonald

BetterPhoto Member
Contact Nikki McDonald
Nikki McDonald's Gallery
  Ignorance speaking here and I probably should be embarrassed to be asking, but doesn't reducing to 72 dpi make it harder to get a good or larger print from a screen shot should one be inclined to do that?


To love this comment, log in above
March 28, 2014

 
chrisbudny.com - Chris Budny

BetterPhoto Member
Contact Chris Budny
Chris Budny's Gallery
  Highlighted Comment: Nope. The DPI value within your file is completely ignored by all web browsers displaying your file. Assuming your gallery had 800 pixel-wide images on display, any screen grab will always produce an 800 pixel-wide result. The screen grab has no 'knowledge' of what you put into the file (DPI setting) when you first uploaded it to BP.


To love this comment, log in above
March 28, 2014

 
- Martha R. Mazon

BetterPhoto Member
Contact Martha R. Mazon
Martha R. Mazon's Gallery
  I hope one of the changes being implemented will be elimination of whatever saturation changes the upload process currently applies. Today I often detect stronger yellows after upload. I attempt to reduce the saturation of yellows in my image before upload, but it's hard to get a good color match this way.

:)


To love this comment, log in above
April 12, 2014

 
high-mountain-photography.com - Sheri Camarda

BetterPhoto Member
Contact Sheri Camarda
Sheri Camarda's Gallery
  Okay, what are the exact sizes etc. do you want for the photo contest? I have been out of the new changes for about 15 months due to an aorta dissection. Everything has changed.


To love this comment, log in above
November 29, 2014

 
- Ken Smith

BetterPhoto Member
Contact Ken Smith
Ken Smith's Gallery
  Sheri, I don't think there's an exact answer. The BP process will automatically resize your uploaded image to 800 pixels on the large size, unless it's smaller than 800 pixels when you upload it. You can easily test this out by uploading an image at 800 pixels...call it "test 1" and do another at 1600 pixels, call it "test 2", then call up both in separate browsers and you'll see they're the same size. You can also check the quality.

Years ago, we had similar discussion on the size issue. Many of us resize our images to 800 pixels, save as TIF, and sharpen a tad. Give it a shot. And you can always test it out by uploading to BP.


To love this comment, log in above
November 29, 2014

 
high-mountain-photography.com - Sheri Camarda

BetterPhoto Member
Contact Sheri Camarda
Sheri Camarda's Gallery
  Okay, thank you. I understand if we dont get the size of the photo just right we wont get a "Editors Pick". So, I want to get it right. Thanks will give it a try.


To love this comment, log in above
November 30, 2014

 
- Ken Smith

BetterPhoto Member
Contact Ken Smith
Ken Smith's Gallery
  Sheri..no, not at all. The uploaded image size has nothing to do with whether an image will be considered for an EP or not.

I'm simply saying that BP's process will auto-reduce the size of your image, if you upload one that's larger than 800 pixels. And some folks have felt this auto-reduction degrades quality. It's hard to say and at most subtle, or perhaps even imaginary. But many of us are just in the habit of resizing to 800 pixels before we upload to BP.

So, please don't think an EP is based on the uploaded photo size. It's the quality of the photo that is most important.


To love this comment, log in above
November 30, 2014

 
This old forum is now archived. Use improved Forum here

Report this Thread