Frank P. Luongo |
|
Photographing Trees with Holiday Lights
At night when shooting photos of trees decorated with lights (all white), how should one accomplish this? F/22 with slow shutter speed? Wider aperture, say f/5.6 with faster shutter speed?
Where do you meter from - one of the lights itself?
Do you open up a stop? Etc.
Thanks.
December 03, 2004
|
|
|
Bob Cammarata |
|
Use a tungsten-balanced film (or proper filtration), and meter off the lights. Your aperture setting will depend upon how much DOF the scene requires.
Keep in mind that a smaller aperture (f-22) will create little starbursts off each light source. You should consider this if you want that effect to show when choosing your f-stop.
It's always wise to bracket these types of exposures to get just what you want.
December 03, 2004
|
|
|
Frank P. Luongo |
|
Thanks, Bob. I appreciate it.
December 03, 2004
|
|
|
Steve Warren |
|
Hi, This is kind of a question for Bob ... By metering off of the lights, won't the scene underexpose? I mean, if it's a high-contrast scene such as a lighted tree at night, wouldn't the meter read the lights as a mid-tone rather than the bright part of a high-contrast scene and treat them as such??
December 06, 2004
|
|
|
Bob Cammarata |
|
Steve,
You are correct, but this type of exposure usually calls for multi-second exposure times ... which doesn't always "play well" with some films.
My advice should have recommended metering off the lights to get a starting point, and to bracket OVER from there. Thanks for pointing this out.
Bob
December 06, 2004
|
|
|
David Robinson |
|
Take an integrated reading of the whole scene.
Take a spot reading off the filament of one of the lights
Under-expose from the spot reading by one stop.
Compare this new reading (ie. the minus one stop exposure) with the integrated reading to ensure that the scene will not be hopelessly underexposed. If ok then use the minus one stop reading for your exposure.
December 07, 2004
|
|
|
David Robinson |
|
Take an integrated reading of the whole scene.
Take a spot reading off the filament of one of the lights
Under-expose from the spot reading by one stop.
Compare this new reading (ie. the minus one stop exposure) with the integrated reading to ensure that the scene will not be hopelessly underexposed. If ok then use the minus one stop reading for your exposure.
December 07, 2004
|
|
|
David Robinson |
|
Take an integrated reading of the whole scene.
Take a spot reading off the filament of one of the lights
Under-expose from the spot reading by one stop.
Compare this new reading (ie. the minus one stop exposure) with the integrated reading to ensure that the scene will not be hopelessly underexposed. If ok then use the minus one stop reading for your exposure.
December 07, 2004
|
|
|
Kristen |
|
This isn't really about exposure, but just a side note...if you use a 6x filter when shooting Christmas lights, it creates cool stars from the lights and has an awesome effect.
December 07, 2004
|
|
|
David Robinson |
|
Take an integrated reading of the whole scene.
Take a spot reading off the filament of one of the lights
Under-expose from the spot reading by one stop.
Compare this new reading (ie. the minus one stop exposure) with the integrated reading to ensure that the scene will not be hopelessly underexposed. If ok then use the minus one stop reading for your exposure.
December 07, 2004
|
|
|
Frank P. Luongo |
|
Thank You All for your suggestions!
How about a street lined by rows of lit trees, in which you want some detail in the shadows,AND you want to stop down to f/22 to get starburst effect?
How would your metering strategy change?Thanks
December 09, 2004
|
|
|
|
Log in to respond or ask your own question.
|
