Rating:
3.5
out of 5
Its good. but i dont find good results in indoor, and when the objects are in motion, like children playing etc.
its good in sunlight.
11/8/2005 11:53:37 PM
Don Claytor Jr.
member since: 2/1/2005
Rating:
3.5
out of 5
For an older camera, this one is quite impressive. The large aperature lense makes-up for the lower number of pixels. Focus is slow but otherwise an excellent camera with plenty of manual control. Definatly a head-turner.
8/2/2005 11:38:23 AM
Kenneth Hupila
member since: 6/25/2004
Rating:
2.5
out of 5
Got a lot of good pictures from this camera. Lack of a viewfinder made framing shots difficult in lots of sunlight.
6/26/2004 9:44:15 AM
Samrat J. Patil
member since: 2/13/2004
Rating:
1.5
out of 5
what i dont like
1.doesnt have an optical zoom
2.there is a big delay after the trigger being pressed and the photo being stored nearly 2 secs.
3.the batteries run out very fast with the lcd on,which is the prime reason of havin a digtal cam instead of optical.
4.come by default with a 4mb memory stick which can only store abt 4 pics at 1024 resolution.you need to shell out 4 grand more for 128mb which is more practical.
5.the picture quality is not good, all the pics look a bit washed out, if u use photoshop it might not be a problem
6.therz no 800x600 resolution available which is more practicle.instad 640,1200 or 1600.
7.in video the there is a lot of framing and no sound.
and there are a lot of more things
the things i like
1.preview the pics and delete unwanted.
2.no hassles to develop photos.
3.can do miracles in photoshop since the pics are already in digital format so no need of scanners.
2/13/2004 10:28:40 AM
Nicole L. DeVelbiss
member since: 10/22/2003
Rating:
3.5
out of 5
Needs more memory space and should come with software to fix movies.
