|
|
Adam W. LeCroy
member since: 6/13/2006
|
Rating:
3
out of 5
This camara isnt the best because of its deign, but it will work well when you need it to.
6/17/2006 2:18:34 PM
|
|
|
Annette Slade
member since: 5/4/2006
|
Rating:
2.5
out of 5
the camera is okay but I can't zoom in on a subject I like from very far away. I want to upgrade to something that I have more controll over.
5/4/2006 11:20:42 PM
|
|
|
Tiffani R. Love
member since: 3/22/2006
|
Rating:
3
out of 5
Its a really good camara, does what its suppost to do, Just wish I had a better one.
3/22/2006 11:31:20 AM
|
|
|
Cam Meikle
member since: 3/13/2006
|
Rating:
2
out of 5
Fugi A-210... Heehee, what can I say, this thing is a brick! It does have a nice enough zoom lens though... Actually, it can take very respectable pictures for such a big ugly chunk! (By todays standards) Lack of money lead me to buy this inexpensive camera on Ebay, after checking out its qualifications... I have a bit of a history with a decent film camera, and a bit of knowledge about the art of photography when done fully manually, so I find the auto everything (what you see is what you get) digital a lot limiting to creativity.
It wasn't all that expensive, so I worry less about it... to tell the truth, I've had this camera with me many times I wouldn't have thought of bringing my full set of minolta equipment. So I can be creative in other ways... The fugi really couldn't be trusted in low light, it likes, like so many digitals, nice bright sun... It was absolutely hopeless in an indoor arena trying to freeze action. You push the shutter release, and wait... and pan, and pan and wait. Well what more can I say?, good, sharp colourful pictures in good light... (No purple fringing) And you don't have to worry about somebody snapping it up if you leave it unattended, it looks like a little brick!
I'm looking forward to upgrading to something better soon, full manual adjustments being formost, but also low light performance, as I like night shots, and some special effects stuff.
3/14/2006 12:35:46 AM
|
|
|
Barbara Firkus
member since: 2/26/2006
|
Rating:
2.5
out of 5
Basic digital camera, gets the job done.
2/28/2006 5:33:22 AM
|
|
|
Lindsey A. Henry
member since: 12/7/2005
|
Rating:
4
out of 5
This is the first digital camera I have owned so I don't have much to compare it to but I am very happy with it.
12/7/2005 4:28:32 AM
|
|
|
Janet L. Ng
member since: 12/3/2005
|
Rating:
2
out of 5
This camera is fine as long as I use the flash, but without the flash, the picture is blurry no matter how still I am.
12/3/2005 7:54:24 PM
|
|
|
Kristin Richardson
member since: 11/25/2005
|
Rating:
4
out of 5
It shows the beauty and art of the piano. It makes you feel as if you are there and able to reach out and play it yourself. It would look better if it was more clear.
11/25/2005 9:14:17 PM
|
|
|
Nanci Fulbright
member since: 8/25/2005
|
Rating:
3.5
out of 5
This little camera continues to impress me with its quality. It is small enough to keep in your purse or vehicle. Mine has been dropped, traveled to several different countries and states and captured ALOT of photographs to still work as if it was new.
11/15/2005 8:09:28 PM
|
|
|
Matt Morris
member since: 11/15/2005
|
Rating:
2
out of 5
Good auto exposure but no manual control
11/15/2005 3:23:40 AM
|
|
|
Zach Duvall
member since: 11/7/2005
|
Rating:
3
out of 5
For a low end point and shoot camera, I was able to get some really nice pictures out of it. It has a good battery life, and great features.
11/11/2005 8:48:07 AM
|
|
|
Ryan P. Feddema
member since: 11/2/2005
|
Rating:
3
out of 5
for a point and shoot, not bad
11/2/2005 7:40:13 PM
|
|
|
CrisMarie Williams
member since: 6/22/2002
|
Rating:
3.5
out of 5
I love this camera. Compact, but takes good pics.
10/25/2005 8:52:38 PM
|
|
|
Karen Day-Lyon
member since: 8/31/2005
|
Rating:
4
out of 5
Very easy to use for a mid-range digital.
9/5/2005 6:23:57 PM
|
|
|
Jim Gunter
member since: 7/20/2005
|
Rating:
3.5
out of 5
I like the clear, crisp pictures it takes and how easy it is to use.
Special settings are easy to change.
I use a lot of batteries taking and downloading pictures.
Overall, I'm pleased with it.
I'm an amateur photograhper, but like to have fun taking lots of pictures.
7/20/2005 7:03:41 PM
|
|
|
Cary M. Durden
member since: 7/6/2005
|
Rating:
2
out of 5
The Fujifilm Finpix A210 is an ok point and shoot digital camera. It's good for someone who is not worried about higher quality (set up) shots. Its a good everyday camera.
7/19/2005 10:23:54 PM
|
|
|
Lynn C. LaBauve
member since: 7/5/2002
|
Rating:
4.5
out of 5
FOR A 3.2 MEGAPIXEL DIGITAL CAMERA, THE FUJI FINEPIX A-210 TAKES GOOD, CLEAR PHOTOS AND IS EASY TO USE.
7/17/2005 11:40:45 PM
|
|
|
Lynn C. LaBauve
member since: 7/5/2002
|
Rating:
4.5
out of 5
FOR A 3.2 MEGAPIXEL DIGITAL CAMERA, THE FUJI FINEPIX A-210 TAKES GOOD, CLEAR PHOTOS AND IS EASY TO USE.
7/17/2005 11:39:36 PM
|
|
|
Lynn C. LaBauve
member since: 7/5/2002
|
Rating:
4
out of 5
FOR A DIGITAL 3.2 MEGAPIXEL DIGITAL, THIS CAMERA TAKES GOOD PICTURES AND IS EASY TO OPERATE:
FUJI FINEPIX A0210
7/17/2005 11:34:08 PM
|
|
|
Robin Bridson
member since: 6/28/2005
|
Rating:
5
out of 5
Easy to use. Very forgiving! Makes even not so good pictures look good!
6/28/2005 6:46:38 AM
|
|
|
Doug C. Neiner
member since: 4/2/2005
|
Rating:
3
out of 5
For shots with good lighting, some sunset shots, etc. the camera works well. It has a horrible time focusing in low lighting.
6/3/2005 7:50:01 PM
|
|
|
Bradford Wiksten
member since: 5/30/2005
|
Rating:
3.5
out of 5
Photos not grainy, simple to use, compact, good price
Slow between photos, poor in low light-could use more options
5/30/2005 12:37:06 AM
|
|
|
Kenneth T. Kroslowitz
member since: 5/25/2005
|
Rating:
1.5
out of 5
Cheap point and shoot. Long processing times.
Battery hog.
5/25/2005 12:58:02 PM
|
|
|
K L. Suvari
member since: 4/27/2005
|
Rating:
3.5
out of 5
It takes good pictures and has great features. Its only has 3.2 megapixels and 3 x optical zoom.
4/29/2005 2:49:54 PM
|
|
|
Fawn Rigali
member since: 5/15/2004
|
Rating:
2
out of 5
Pictures are good, but there is a vast delay in time.
4/26/2005 10:57:42 PM
|
|
|
Mathilda L. Vines
member since: 4/16/2005
|
Rating:
3.5
out of 5
I really like this camera.
4/16/2005 4:09:23 AM
|
|
|
Yaakov Dovid Saxon
member since: 4/7/2005
|
Rating:
2.5
out of 5
Decent Camera,
No good for proffesional use, because the max resolution is 3 megapixels.
It is a little bit noisy (resolution, not sound)when used indoors. the more light the better.
however for the money, it is a pretty good camera.
4/7/2005 9:57:29 AM
|
|
|
Pat Poling
member since: 4/3/2005
|
Rating:
4
out of 5
The camera is easy to use and produces great color with natural light.
4/3/2005 5:48:33 PM
|
|
|
Patrick K. Adams
member since: 4/1/2005
|
Rating:
4
out of 5
I love the camera it is small and easy to use , i wish it was a slr.
4/1/2005 2:44:01 PM
|
|
|
Hilah Teague
member since: 12/10/2004
|
Rating:
2
out of 5
Good for point and shoot....no bells and whistles
3/30/2005 10:35:30 AM
|
|
|
Joel M. Hanger
member since: 3/10/2005
|
Rating:
2
out of 5
Decent point and shoot. Pretty Low DPI.
3/18/2005 8:44:18 AM
|
|
|
Ellen Cullen
member since: 1/27/2005
|
Rating:
1.5
out of 5
This a great family camera but it has nowhere near the capability to take the kind of outdoor photos I would like.
3/16/2005 10:39:18 AM
|
|
|
Peggy Bojalad
member since: 3/9/2005
|
Rating:
3.5
out of 5
I love my fijifilm camera it takes really great pictures. The only thing i dont like about it is that i cant seems to take very good pictures at night with the flash off, one slight movement and the whole picture is blurred. I have lost alot of what would have been great pictures over this fault........
3/13/2005 6:22:08 PM
|
|
|
Kristin G. Thompson
member since: 3/11/2005
|
Rating:
3.5
out of 5
I love my camera I have taken alot of pictures with it and even got a reward for a picture I turn in to catch a person stealing
3/11/2005 4:33:23 PM
|
|
|
Christina Wowk
member since: 2/23/2005
|
Rating:
3
out of 5
I like this camera because it is afordable and takes good photos. I like the setting and the various options you have to encrease quality of your photograph. However it does no have much focus/zooming to take far away pictures.
I think over all it is a great good camera
2/24/2005 6:19:28 AM
|
|
|
Tereasa D. McCoy
member since: 2/21/2005
|
Rating:
5
out of 5
I really like my camera a lot. It takes great pictures. There's not anything that I dislike about my camera.
2/21/2005 8:07:29 PM
|
|
|
Sharon Somero
member since: 2/5/2005
|
Rating:
2.5
out of 5
While only one year old, this camera is already outdated, and does not offer the flexibility I would prefer. The flash is not very strong. However, the images are clear and sharp, and I have no complaints on the picture quality.
2/5/2005 6:10:06 PM
|
|
|
Karen Parrish
member since: 2/3/2005
|
Rating:
4
out of 5
I really like this camera. The only thing I would change about it is that it had a little bit stronger zoom on it for those close-up picture opportunities.
2/3/2005 11:46:42 AM
|
|
|
Liene
member since: 12/5/2004
|
Rating:
2.5
out of 5
ok, there is my opinion about my camera. It's ok, but there aren't so many possibilities to do with her. I think that for me this foto camera is really grate, because I am just a "green" starter in foto art :). I like to photot black-and white fotos, because a coloured picter quality it's only normal. But I suggest this camera only for them, who are just starting fotographing.
And else if somebody know ZENIT photo camera, that you must know that i't is perfect for starting this jo/hobby - photographing.
12/5/2004 9:08:24 AM
|
|
|
Dan J. Smith
member since: 11/23/2004
|
Rating:
3
out of 5
Good entry level camera for taking snapshots and basic pictures.
11/23/2004 12:34:34 PM
|
|
|
Yolanda Laurel
member since: 7/6/2004
|
Rating:
4
out of 5
I didn't like my camera at first until I started taking self-portraits and discovered it captures sharp images. Also one day while on board the Amtrak train, I took a photograph of nature/landscape while the train was passing through the mountainside of Santa Barbara, California. It gave me a beautiful picture showing details of the mountains, texture and color. The thing I didn't like in it was the delay in shooting, however, I realized later on that it does not capture any image without proper lighting. I know I can use this camera in its manual mode, but I haven't done that yet. All photographs I had taken were on auto-focus.
8/16/2004 10:47:02 AM
|
|
|
Yolanda Laurel
member since: 7/6/2004
|
Rating:
4
out of 5
I didn't like my camera at first until I started taking self-portraits and discovered it captures sharp images. Also one day while on board the Amtrak train, I took a photograph of nature/landscape while the train was passing through the mountainside of Santa Barbara, California. It gave me a beautiful picture showing details of the mountains, texture and color. The thing I didn't like in it was the delay in shooting, however, I realized later on that it does not capture any image without proper lighting. I know I can use this camera in its manual mode, but I haven't done that yet. All photographs I had taken were on auto-focus.
8/16/2004 10:46:00 AM
|
|
|
Leeanne Barr
member since: 7/24/2004
|
Rating:
3.5
out of 5
I am just discovering the world of digital photography. I like this camera because it is compact and gives me high quality shots.
7/26/2004 6:50:24 PM
|
|
|
Robyn R. Dormire
member since: 7/24/2004
|
Rating:
3.5
out of 5
This camera was a gift and it is my first digital. I think it works well, however, I know there are better ones out there. I understand the more megapixels the better the picture?? This particular camera has 3.2.....but I do love it and I am having lots of fun with it!
7/24/2004 7:32:08 PM
|
|
|
Anthony A. Wirkus
member since: 6/14/2004
|
Rating:
3
out of 5
It's a good camera for the money, except it eat's batteries like crazy, which costs a fortune!
6/14/2004 10:01:04 AM
|
|
|
Linda Marx
member since: 7/12/2003
|
Rating:
3
out of 5
It is an affordable camera and easy to carry around when you are out for a long time. It does not have a very far viewing range though.
6/1/2004 6:15:35 AM
|
|
|
Carmen L. Tacoronte
member since: 5/16/2004
|
Rating:
4
out of 5
I really like the image quality. It is excellent when taking pics outdoors. Darker settings tend to result in grainy and blurry images.
5/25/2004 4:53:58 PM
|
|
|
Colleen M. OMalley
member since: 4/30/2004
|
Rating:
3
out of 5
This camera takes very nice pictures, is easy to operate, is great for beginners, but, it uses batteries like its going out of style! I change batteries at least once a week!
4/30/2004 8:14:43 PM
|
|
|
Bonnie J. Carpenter
member since: 3/30/2004
|
Rating:
3.5
out of 5
Excellent for macro, portraits, haven't tried using it for landscape photos yet, great camera for the money, goes through alot of batteries though i would recomend a battery charger
3/30/2004 1:48:01 PM
|
|
|
Peggy A. Bojalad
member since: 3/2/2004
|
Rating:
4
out of 5
I have no exsperience on what this camera is going to be like yet i just purchased it, but in comparison to my last camera which was a hp photosmart 612 it is takes alot clearer pictures and can be printed alot clearer also. So i would give it an A+++++...........
3/2/2004 11:37:22 PM
|
|
|
Jaime L. Simpson
member since: 3/1/2004
|
Rating:
4
out of 5
It takes great pictures but its a pain to delete and so forth. That aspect could be a little easier to do. Also, it shuts off to quickly when not being used.
3/2/2004 6:32:03 AM
|
|
|
Steve R. Sage
member since: 2/25/2004
|
Rating:
4.5
out of 5
excellent pictures,easy to use
2/25/2004 10:43:50 PM
|
|
|
Matt B. Oakley
member since: 2/15/2004
|
Rating:
2.5
out of 5
Its an ok camera
2/15/2004 12:13:24 PM
|
|
|
Heather F. Van Vlymen
member since: 1/20/2004
|
Rating:
4.5
out of 5
First digital cam I've owned and I really enjoy it.
1/20/2004 6:22:28 PM
|
|
|
Amanda Peterson
member since: 1/18/2004
|
Rating:
4.5
out of 5
I love it!
1/18/2004 9:47:26 AM
|
|
|
