|
|
Adam W. LeCroy

member since: 6/13/2006
|
Rating:
3
out of 5
This camara isnt the best because of its deign, but it will work well when you need it to.
6/17/2006 2:18:34 PM
|
|
|
Annette Slade
member since: 5/4/2006
|
Rating:
2.5
out of 5
the camera is okay but I can't zoom in on a subject I like from very far away. I want to upgrade to something that I have more controll over.
5/4/2006 11:20:42 PM
|
|
|
Tiffani R. Love
member since: 3/22/2006
|
Rating:
3
out of 5
Its a really good camara, does what its suppost to do, Just wish I had a better one.
3/22/2006 11:31:20 AM
|
|
|
Cam Meikle
member since: 3/13/2006
|
Rating:
2
out of 5
Fugi A-210... Heehee, what can I say, this thing is a brick! It does have a nice enough zoom lens though... Actually, it can take very respectable pictures for such a big ugly chunk! (By todays standards) Lack of money lead me to buy this inexpensive camera on Ebay, after checking out its qualifications... I have a bit of a history with a decent film camera, and a bit of knowledge about the art of photography when done fully manually, so I find the auto everything (what you see is what you get) digital a lot limiting to creativity.
It wasn't all that expensive, so I worry less about it... to tell the truth, I've had this camera with me many times I wouldn't have thought of bringing my full set of minolta equipment. So I can be creative in other ways... The fugi really couldn't be trusted in low light, it likes, like so many digitals, nice bright sun... It was absolutely hopeless in an indoor arena trying to freeze action. You push the shutter release, and wait... and pan, and pan and wait. Well what more can I say?, good, sharp colourful pictures in good light... (No purple fringing) And you don't have to worry about somebody snapping it up if you leave it unattended, it looks like a little brick!
I'm looking forward to upgrading to something better soon, full manual adjustments being formost, but also low light performance, as I like night shots, and some special effects stuff.
3/14/2006 12:35:46 AM
|
|
|
Barbara Firkus
member since: 2/26/2006
|
Rating:
2.5
out of 5
Basic digital camera, gets the job done.
2/28/2006 5:33:22 AM
|
|
|
Lindsey A. Henry
member since: 12/7/2005
|
Rating:
4
out of 5
This is the first digital camera I have owned so I don't have much to compare it to but I am very happy with it.
12/7/2005 4:28:32 AM
|
|
|
Janet L. Ng
member since: 12/3/2005
|
Rating:
2
out of 5
This camera is fine as long as I use the flash, but without the flash, the picture is blurry no matter how still I am.
12/3/2005 7:54:24 PM
|
|
|
Kristin Richardson
member since: 11/25/2005
|
Rating:
4
out of 5
It shows the beauty and art of the piano. It makes you feel as if you are there and able to reach out and play it yourself. It would look better if it was more clear.
11/25/2005 9:14:17 PM
|
|
|
Nanci Fulbright
member since: 8/25/2005
|
Rating:
3.5
out of 5
This little camera continues to impress me with its quality. It is small enough to keep in your purse or vehicle. Mine has been dropped, traveled to several different countries and states and captured ALOT of photographs to still work as if it was new.
11/15/2005 8:09:28 PM
|
|
|
Matt Morris
member since: 11/15/2005
|
Rating:
2
out of 5
Good auto exposure but no manual control
11/15/2005 3:23:40 AM
|
|
|
Zach Duvall
member since: 11/7/2005
|
Rating:
3
out of 5
For a low end point and shoot camera, I was able to get some really nice pictures out of it. It has a good battery life, and great features.
11/11/2005 8:48:07 AM
|
|
|