Rating:
2.5
out of 5
It performs quite good considering the fact that it is an "idiot-camera" toy which costs less than 100 €... Especially if you are shooting in "lovely wethaaa" (I just saw Pink Panther movie so don't mind me)...
It doesn't have a lens cover so you have to wipe it every time you want to take a photo or else you'll get big stains on your photo...
Actually it's pritty anoying and I don't use it anymore since I got the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ5...
6/18/2006 4:12:40 PM
Cathy H. McMahan
member since: 11/17/2005
Rating:
4.5
out of 5
I have been using the camera for approximately four years and see qualilty pictues when taken developed. If the pictures are not good it is because of my lack of knowledge in photography. I do not have another digital camera to compare it to but I find that is comparable in results to other brands.
11/17/2005 10:10:40 AM
Maricela L. Beal
member since: 11/4/2005
Rating:
3.5
out of 5
Nice little camera. Great shots
11/4/2005 11:12:01 AM
Greg W. Halliday
member since: 7/28/2005
Rating:
3
out of 5
Good no nonsense camera, cheap and great photo's
7/28/2005 3:22:13 AM
member since: 5/20/2004
Rating:
4
out of 5
Best possible what you can get from 2MP camera.
Rating:
2.5
out of 5
My first digital camera. It's bottom of the line, but gets the job done for the most part. Definitely not professional quality. Need to upgrade a.s.a.p.