|
|
Robert A. Tuttle
member since: 6/30/2006
|
Rating:
2.5
out of 5
This has been a good camera to just carry around. The picture quality is accepptable, especially for website work. Speed is slow, so don't try to take to many action shots.
6/30/2006 7:22:32 AM
|
|
|
Stephanie A. Baassler
member since: 5/1/2006
|
Rating:
3.5
out of 5
Quality is excellent on the highest setting. Do not like the delay between pressing the shutter and the photo actually being taken.
5/1/2006 1:56:36 PM
|
|
|
Sophie Cornish
member since: 4/7/2006
|
Rating:
3
out of 5
my camara is a great friend of pictures but a bit to big for my liking
4/7/2006 11:07:40 AM
|
|
|
Alana Hope
member since: 11/14/2005
|
Rating:
3.5
out of 5
i love my camera. it was a gift from my mother whom is a great photographer.
11/14/2005 10:01:03 PM
|
|
|
Jeremy P. Miller
member since: 9/19/2005
|
Rating:
3.5
out of 5
easy to use good pics
9/19/2005 5:07:14 PM
|
|
|
Russell A. Signs
member since: 8/10/2005
|
Rating:
4.5
out of 5
Pretty nice camera. We recently bought a Canon due to the plague of mechanical problems with the Olympus.
8/10/2005 7:38:10 PM
|
|
|
Whitney C. Aschenbrener
member since: 7/23/2005
|
Rating:
3
out of 5
its easy to use and takes ok pictures...
7/23/2005 8:52:14 PM
|
|
|
Lorie M. Egerer
member since: 6/25/2005
|
Rating:
3
out of 5
My first digital camera. I learned on it. I recently bought my son a Kodak easy share and it is a much faster and more versatile camera. I do a lot of wild animal photography and it is not fast enough to capture the photo as it is seen and I often lose a photo because the camera is too slow. I have learned to "track" through the viewfinder, which helps, but still lose some photos that are too quick for the camera. Otherwise, I love it.
6/25/2005 3:41:55 PM
|
|
|
Aaron Reyes
member since: 2/8/2005
|
Rating:
3
out of 5
decent camera. got a lot of good use out of it.
5/26/2005 11:52:07 AM
|
|
|
Andres Melendro
member since: 3/15/2005
|
Rating:
4
out of 5
Good Camera, nice effects.
5/23/2005 1:51:58 PM
|
|
|
Shari L. Dunn
member since: 4/23/2005
|
Rating:
4
out of 5
Great camera for point and shoot. Takes SLR quality.
4/23/2005 12:24:03 PM
|
|
|
Anjanette Fabiano
member since: 4/18/2005
|
Rating:
4
out of 5
I love the quality of the photos I get from it, but the bulkines and weight or its downsides
4/18/2005 6:22:15 PM
|
|
|
Chris Aschenbrener
member since: 4/7/2005
|
Rating:
1.5
out of 5
Nice pic quality but very slow focusing and zooming. Easy on batteries though. Fun as a point and shoot and easy to carry.
4/14/2005 10:36:15 PM
|
|
|
Barbara Buglio
member since: 4/8/2005
|
Rating:
3.5
out of 5
Good solid point and shoot.
only 3.4 megapixels
4/13/2005 6:25:06 AM
|
|
|
Victoria L. Hutson
member since: 3/30/2005
|
Rating:
3.5
out of 5
I bought this camera three years ago. For a 3 megapixel camera it takes good photos.
4/8/2005 9:06:06 PM
|
|
|
Tony ODonoghue
photosbytonyo.com
member since: 4/4/2005
|
Rating:
4
out of 5
A great little point and shoot.
4/4/2005 9:42:01 AM
|
|
|
Philip Smith
member since: 7/10/2004
|
Rating:
3.5
out of 5
Great little camera, my first digital. I got it a few years ago, but still use it because of its low f. stop and it's wide angle. I's slow to start, and clunks a bit, and is only 3 MP, but you get great results if you bear with it, especially when using the in camera BW function.
3/8/2005 1:06:18 AM
|
|
|
Sara J. West
member since: 2/25/2005
|
Rating:
4
out of 5
Was very happpy with it until I dropped it and broke the lens mechanism.
3/3/2005 7:28:46 AM
|
|
|
Kim Perkins
member since: 1/26/2005
|
Rating:
4.5
out of 5
great all around! I wish it had interchangeable lenses
1/26/2005 8:39:18 PM
|
|
|
Steven Sawula
member since: 12/3/2004
|
Rating:
4
out of 5
As a point and shoot or still shot camera or even an informal portrait camera...it is great. Only problem I care to mention is the shutter lag. If you want to shoot someone in the process of an activity, it is near impossible to capture the shot as you intended to.
12/25/2004 8:51:26 AM
|
|
|
Mike Davis
member since: 4/2/2002
|
Rating:
2.5
out of 5
This was my first digital camera. I used it alot, I liked it alot but it developed some bad pixels and was a bit clunky. I replace it with another Olympus that fits neatly in your pocket.
12/16/2004 2:22:50 PM
|
|
|
Erica M. Berrigan
member since: 10/15/2004
|
Rating:
4.5
out of 5
Easy to use. Great for travel.
10/15/2004 3:18:15 PM
|
|
|
Gale Beery
member since: 7/15/2004
|
Rating:
4
out of 5
like it better than the Nikon
8/28/2004 10:51:14 AM
|
|
|
Debbie L. Quintero
member since: 8/21/2004
|
Rating:
4.5
out of 5
I love the camera a lot. Olympus has continued their success in the digital world as they did
in the 35mm.
8/21/2004 6:06:13 PM
|
|
|
Cyndi Curtis
member since: 8/9/2004
|
Rating:
4
out of 5
Easy to use, a bit large
8/9/2004 2:03:57 PM
|
|
|
Dan Walpole
member since: 5/4/2004
|
Rating:
3.5
out of 5
I feel that the only downfall about this camera is that it is a 3 megapixel. Everything on this camera is easy to use and works great.
5/13/2004 6:34:26 AM
|
|
|
Barry L. Morrison
member since: 4/12/2004
|
Rating:
3.5
out of 5
I purchased this camera in January of 2000. At that time it was about as good as you could get. But now it is time to upgrade to 6megapixel and SLR viewing.
4/14/2004 4:47:02 PM
|
|
|
Martin Suez
member since: 3/26/2004
|
Rating:
3.5
out of 5
I like my camera, it was expensive and it is only 3 - 4 years old, and u could get something like that for a 5th of the money i paid. i want to get a slr camera soon.
3/26/2004 1:02:01 PM
|
|
|
Veronica C. Romero
member since: 3/5/2004
|
Rating:
3.5
out of 5
I enjoy this camera because if the object i am taking a photo of is far i don't have to change lenses like the other cammera i have. I like the fact that the pictures are digital and i don't have to develop them.
3/6/2004 9:46:08 PM
|
|
|
Desiree M. Bento
member since: 2/12/2004
|
Rating:
4
out of 5
I love this camera. It is the second digital camera I have owned and I am still learning it's manual features. I've used a manual film camera in the past and loved the power of using natural light, aperture, shutter speed and developing techniques. Once I learn to use the manual features on my Olympus 3000 I just might change the rating to a 10.
2/12/2004 9:15:00 PM
|
|
|
Tshechu D. Wong
member since: 1/26/2004
|
Rating:
3
out of 5
It is just good. Now newer models with less expesive. That time this camera was expensive as it was the beginning of the digital photo system
1/26/2004 5:58:02 AM
|
|
|
Katrina A. Lassiter
member since: 1/22/2004
|
Rating:
4
out of 5
My Olympus takes clear, high quality photographs and has endless shooting options, but is heavier than I prefer while traveling. When the camera first came out it was top of the line, I wish someone would have told me that it would be hundreds of dollars cheaper if I waited a year to buy it.
1/22/2004 9:38:28 PM
|
|
|
Wendy Blank
member since: 12/30/2003
|
Rating:
5
out of 5
For a two megapixel camera, the Olympus 2100 is outstanding.
1/3/2004 6:11:45 PM
|
|
|
Michele McIntosh
member since: 12/19/2003
|
Rating:
4
out of 5
For a 1st digital point and shoot this is an excellent camera. I get good quality photos.
12/19/2003 7:23:46 PM
|
|
|
Sherrie D. Smith
member since: 12/3/2003
|
Rating:
3.5
out of 5
Im ok with the olympus 3000z for a 3.3mp
But its time to get a better one
12/3/2003 6:59:27 PM
|
|
|
James F. Hines, Jr.
member since: 12/2/2003
|
Rating:
4
out of 5
pretty good camera, chews up batteries and leave lines when taking pictures of something shiny like chrome.
12/2/2003 12:36:15 PM
|
|
|
Sara West
member since: 11/9/2003
|
Rating:
4.5
out of 5
Pictures are great. Just don't like the shutter lag from the size of the pixels being uploaded. Want a new one - a 740 or 750 Olympus - they are supposed to be updated in that manner
11/9/2003 4:53:15 PM
|
|
|
Ingrid Williams
member since: 11/6/2003
|
Rating:
4
out of 5
Great for stepping out of automatic and into higher quality ... love the versatility of the controls and quality of photos (even though it's surpassed now by bigger and better models) ... love the lens.
Wish someone had told me ... I had a lot of repairs (all under warranty) for the mechanism freezing up.
11/6/2003 8:10:10 PM
|
|
|
Tim S. Sell
member since: 10/21/2003
|
Rating:
4.5
out of 5
i love it...its perfect for the beginner...lets you be as creative with your setup as possible.. or you can just point and shoot. Perfect for my ability and knowledge...great camera highly recommend it.
10/21/2003 7:50:07 PM
|
|
|
Stevan Gorcester
member since: 10/19/2003
|
Rating:
3.5
out of 5
Good picture quality at 3.2 mp. I would like to have higher pixel count. Lens quality is excellent. Takes lithium batteries or optionally standard AA. Very nice to be able to obtain compatible batteries anywhere.
10/19/2003 10:21:09 PM
|
|
|
Fred Mannerino
Contact Fred
Fred's Gallery
member since: 10/3/2003
|
Rating:
3.5
out of 5
Decent camera outmoded the day after creation
10/3/2003 3:21:35 PM
|
|
|
Phil S
member since: 9/27/2003
|
Rating:
4
out of 5
This was my first digital camera so my training wheels were attached. Lots of nice features but I did not really get into many of the available functions. For my first camera and the shots that it produced, it was great.
9/30/2003 11:32:26 AM
|
|
|
Cheryl Anquoe-Parnacher
member since: 9/26/2003
|
Rating:
3.5
out of 5
I'M VERY HAPPY WITH THE CAMERA, IT'S MY FIRST DIGITAL. THE IMAGE QUALITY IS EXCELLENT ALTHOUGH IT IS A 3.5 MEGA PIXEL. I WOULD LIKE TO PURCHASE A HIGHER RESOLUTION IN THE FUTURE.
9/26/2003 10:57:21 AM
|
|
|
William P. Trainor
member since: 8/7/2003
|
Rating:
4
out of 5
Great color and details. Somewhat difficult to learn.
8/7/2003 6:37:46 AM
|
|
|
Dudley Swann, Jr
member since: 10/20/2001
|
Rating:
3
out of 5
It's a good little camera for point & shoot. Too slow for most action pics. Nice to have as a "honey, put this in your purse" camera.
8/6/2003 8:15:54 AM
|
|
|
Michael Foster
member since: 6/17/2003
|
Rating:
3.5
out of 5
I find the C-3000Z(getting quite old now)to be a high quality camera. I have enjoyed using it.
8/5/2003 3:08:14 PM
|
|
|
Brenda Laverty
member since: 4/25/2002
|
Rating:
3.5
out of 5
impressive
7/2/2003 7:40:50 PM
|
|
|
Linda Kupstas
member since: 3/14/2003
|
Rating:
3.5
out of 5
Great starter camera for someone starting out in digital.. I love this little camera has lots that is is capable of doing. Takes really clear pictures on SHQ but eats the batteries like crazy. And I wish someone would have told me about the battery usage when I bought it. I did finally go buy rechargeables. They sure save buying regular batteries
6/19/2003 6:05:13 PM
|
|
|
Jen Jesseph
member since: 5/14/2003
|
Rating:
4
out of 5
I love everything about this camera except the slow write speed. It makes it difficult to photograph moving objects, such as children. Otherwise, the options are great and the quality has been outstanding. I have printed up to 11x14 and it has been crystal clear.
6/18/2003 7:46:12 PM
|
|
|
Bradley D. Benjamin
member since: 5/27/2001
|
Rating:
4
out of 5
I bought one of these a couple months ago and love it. I do wish it had a couple other options though. It has shutter speeds from 1/800 sec to 16 seconds, I wish it had a "B" setting to have more control over exposure times. It doesn't allow multiple exposures either. The aperture only goes from f2.8 to f11, I would like it to go all the way to f1.4. It is very easy to use, and takes wonderful pictures. I print them out at up to 11x14 and they look great. Batteries last an amazing amount of time, even when using the LCD screen constantly. Upgrade lenses are available, but are hard to find and require a ring adapter. Overall, a very nice digital camera.
|
|
|
carl wemhoener
member since: 10/6/2001
|
Rating:
4
out of 5
The C3000Z is an excellent camera for the money. 81/2 x 11 prints come out very nice.
|
|
|
