|
|
Tim Blackburn
member since: 3/24/2006
|
Rating:
4
out of 5
takes great pictures!
3/24/2006 5:15:10 PM
|
|
|
Nicole J. Garcia
member since: 1/6/2006
|
Rating:
2
out of 5
This camera is good for still photos. It doesn't zoom to well and doesn't have too many photo options (i.e portrait, landscape, etc.)
1/6/2006 3:19:04 PM
|
|
|
Jeffrey A. Walsh
member since: 12/4/2005
|
Rating:
5
out of 5
Vey good resuloution
12/4/2005 4:26:37 PM
|
|
|
ANNETTE M. ANDERSON
member since: 7/15/2005
|
Rating:
3.5
out of 5
lightweight, takes good pictures, video quality good
7/15/2005 12:16:04 PM
|
|
|
Meghan E. Gaspar
member since: 4/26/2005
|
Rating:
2.5
out of 5
photo quality not as good.. great as a webcam
4/26/2005 8:41:29 AM
|
|
|
Kimberly A. Prim
member since: 4/1/2005
|
Rating:
2.5
out of 5
works nice
4/1/2005 8:03:55 AM
|
|
|
Mary M. Carmichael
member since: 1/21/2005
|
Rating:
1
out of 5
It was good for us vs. the disposables we always bought, now I would like to upgrade to a really nice quality digital.
1/21/2005 10:48:09 PM
|
|
|
Mary M. Carmichael
member since: 1/21/2005
|
Rating:
1
out of 5
I had always wanted to own a digital camera. I usually bought the disposable cameras that you get in wal-mart. One day at the store, saw this one for half off. It was only 49.00. I decided I couldn't pass it up, thinking that some cheapo camera was better than the disposables.
Now I am getting more and more interested in taking pictures, so I want to upgrade someday soon.
I would spend more money and get a better quality.
1/21/2005 10:42:02 PM
|
|
|
Mary M. Carmichael
member since: 1/21/2005
|
Rating:
1
out of 5
I had always wanted to own a digital camera. I usually bought the disposable cameras that you get in wal-mart. One day at the store, saw this one for half off. It was only 49.00. I decided I couldn't pass it up, thinking that some cheapo camera was better than the disposables.
Now I am getting more and more interested in taking pictures, so I want to upgrade someday soon.
I would spend more money and get a better quality.
1/21/2005 10:38:46 PM
|
|
|
James M. Loomis
member since: 11/13/2004
|
Rating:
0
out of 5
Piece of crap. Don't buy anything Aiptek, stick with a camera company. My granparents bought me this thing knowing I was into photography. This is a great camera if you have very very very very low standards for picture quality, and horrifically poor performance in prints.
11/17/2004 8:48:49 AM
|
|
|
Dana M. Pickerell
member since: 9/30/2004
|
Rating:
1.5
out of 5
It is a decent camera, not many features, not very good focus or zoom. Picture speed is slow so mini tripod is almost always necessary. No flash, low light pictures impossible. Must buy additional memory for it to be worth anything. Sadly, its the only camera I can afford!
9/30/2004 10:15:11 PM
|
|
|
|
|
Rating:
2
out of 5
pictures are smooth looking not blurry gives a soft picture. only thing i did not like is you have to have lots of light there is no flash on this camera.but easy to use great for kids to start out with.no zoom on it either
8/5/2004 8:38:04 AM
|
|
|
Marsha Jackson
member since: 4/18/2004
|
Rating:
2
out of 5
I would like for my camera to have a zoom lens
5/18/2004 2:10:58 AM
|
|
|
Joe Episcopo
member since: 3/6/2004
|
Rating:
4
out of 5
An excellent camera for the money.Very rugged except for the battery cover that can come off too easily. For the money <$70 I can't say anything bad. I have taken some very stunning photos with this little camera. In the photo mode it is not good for night time photography without external light source. But suprisingly it will take excellent video in the dark with just existing light.
3/6/2004 5:04:04 PM
|
|
|
Michel Balaj
member since: 2/4/2004
|
Rating:
3.5
out of 5
Its a nice cam
2/4/2004 12:27:24 PM
|
|
|
Ada Lang
member since: 1/23/2004
|
Rating:
1.5
out of 5
The batteries only last a week & the camera doesn't hold the images once they run out plus no flash.........
Lousy camera except for the size. Wish I'd kept the receipt so we could return it.
1/23/2004 5:47:16 AM
|
|
|
Christina Demers
member since: 12/6/2003
|
Rating:
2
out of 5
Poor resolution, shoddy video performance, dim lighting and little to no accuracy in aiming
12/6/2003 11:18:55 PM
|
|
|
Amber L. Farhat
member since: 10/22/2003
|
Rating:
3.5
out of 5
It is a great camer for short clips and lots of snapshots. Not too ideal for long video images.
10/22/2003 6:25:22 AM
|
|
|
Stephanie E. Turner
member since: 8/1/2003
|
Rating:
1.5
out of 5
not bad. needs auto focus and a flash. has lots of good features though. takes good pictures outside.
8/1/2003 7:20:20 AM
|
|
|
