|
|
Silviu Ionescu
member since: 9/22/2005
|
Rating:
2
out of 5
Average picture quality, slow focus, slow start-up. Good pictures in natural light.
9/22/2005 6:36:38 AM
|
|
|
Laurrie Lolly
member since: 7/26/2005
|
Rating:
2.5
out of 5
The HP Photosmart 318 worked okay, except for settings sticking while using it in cold weather (couldn't zoom and then change back at times). The normal to download photos is connect cable then turn on camera. Sometimes it wouldn't recgonize the camera (had to unplug camera while turned on and then plug back in to get it to work).
Overall I really enjoyed it. It was my first digital camera.
9/9/2005 10:03:23 AM
|
|
|
Arul Arokia Sagayaraj Abraham
member since: 5/10/2005
|
Rating:
4
out of 5
The camare is really good. It is a good equipment to pass time and comes up handy on occasions. The zoom is bit less.
5/10/2005 12:28:00 AM
|
|
|
Marea
member since: 4/19/2003
|
Rating:
3.5
out of 5
Very user friendly and takes great pictures. I think it is a great camera for someone who just wants to take simple pictures. i like the photo quality.
4/29/2005 6:07:27 PM
|
|
|
Kelly Schultz
member since: 4/29/2005
|
Rating:
3.5
out of 5
It's a good "starter" camera. It was the first digital camera i got, so I've not really tried any others yet. (hopefully soon!)
4/29/2005 10:52:53 AM
|
|
|
Jana D. Hawes
member since: 1/25/2005
|
Rating:
2.5
out of 5
easy, good overall camera
1/25/2005 12:25:36 PM
|
|
|
Christopher S. Mugglebee
member since: 10/9/2004
|
Rating:
1.5
out of 5
Not great stabilzation and focus, poor shutter speed.
10/9/2004 4:36:12 PM
|
|
|
Mark J. Mohapp
member since: 3/10/2003
|
Rating:
1
out of 5
I just borrowed this camera from a friend. I really dislike it.
8/29/2004 7:37:11 PM
|
|
|
Nicole M. Braley
member since: 7/13/2004
|
Rating:
3.5
out of 5
Its a good camera .I still want a newer one they keep getting better all the time.
7/13/2004 1:54:56 PM
|
|
|
Paul Parent
Contact Paul
Paul's Gallery
paulparent.org
member since: 4/27/2004
|
Rating:
2.5
out of 5
Nice 2 MP camera,
medium resolution.
6/28/2004 3:42:31 AM
|
|
|
Gloria B. Wood
Contact Gloria
Gloria's Gallery
member since: 12/30/2000
|
Rating:
4.5
out of 5
Excellent camera for a beginner. Good results with automatic settings.
6/25/2004 5:13:23 PM
|
|
|
Christina M. Helmer-Perry
member since: 5/23/2004
|
Rating:
4
out of 5
It takes the best outdoor nature type pictures. It is crisp and clear.
5/23/2004 9:55:58 AM
|
|
|
Christina M. Helmer-Perry
member since: 5/23/2004
|
Rating:
3
out of 5
I think it takes the best nature pictures, it seems to know exactly how I need to capture the photo. It captures light and shadow great. It also takes great in motion pic's of my grandchildren. It's a great 1st digital camera
5/23/2004 9:51:31 AM
|
|
|
Peter S. Page
member since: 4/24/2004
|
Rating:
3
out of 5
A very good camera for point and shoot digital work.
4/24/2004 5:25:16 AM
|
|
|
Joy Turner-Price
member since: 4/22/2004
|
Rating:
2.5
out of 5
I like the way this camera captures light. It is great for low light situations when you shut off the auto flash and picks up light I could never get with a 35mm no matter what filters I used. But I hate the shutter delay - it makes me crazy.
4/22/2004 10:54:23 AM
|
|
|
Dawn Mitchell
member since: 3/19/2004
|
Rating:
4
out of 5
This is my first Digital camera and I really like it. It does take nice photos and the best thing about it that there is no film I just need to point and shoot.
4/2/2004 11:11:11 AM
|
|
|
Kelly A. Tierney
member since: 3/27/2004
|
Rating:
4.5
out of 5
This is an incredible camera, great for it's price. Doesn't take great night shots but still wouldn't feel right using a different camera.
3/27/2004 10:53:03 PM
|
|
|
Beverly K. Evans
member since: 3/24/2004
|
Rating:
2
out of 5
A GOOD CAMERA FOR JUST FAMILY PHOTO OPS. BUT NOT SO GOOD FOR PRO. USE. IT IS AUTO FOCUS AND DOESNT HAVE ANY OPTIONS OTHER THAN QUALITY.
3/24/2004 10:56:16 AM
|
|
|
Jason Hauck
member since: 1/23/2003
|
Rating:
2.5
out of 5
good point and shoot digital
3/11/2004 10:23:16 AM
|
|
|
Jennifer A. Lewis
member since: 3/11/2003
|
Rating:
4
out of 5
I love the size and the quality of photos you can get out of this little thing. Very pleased. Easy to use. Cost effective.
3/7/2004 12:43:34 PM
|
|
|
Karen Seargeant
Contact Karen
Karen's Gallery
karenseargeant.com
member since: 1/18/2003
|
Rating:
3.5
out of 5
Was a really good camera for starters.
2/27/2004 10:51:03 PM
|
|
|
Rick E. Davie
member since: 2/23/2004
|
Rating:
2
out of 5
i have already bought a new camera this hp was just a starter
2/23/2004 8:35:48 PM
|
|
|
Andrew Callahan
member since: 1/31/2004
|
Rating:
2.5
out of 5
I recieved the camera for Christmas 2002. It was great for a beginner like me who didn't even know if he liked photography or not but as far as camers go it's far from the best. The controls are all manual with no room for personal adjustments. I have recently upgraded to a Fugi Finepix s602 which hasn't led me astray yet. The HP was still able to give me some exceptional shots, however, and even some nice 8"x10"s including the one I just submitted.
1/31/2004 7:43:26 PM
|
|
|
Sheila A. LaCounte
member since: 12/28/2003
|
Rating:
3.5
out of 5
I returned this camera to the store to purchase the PDR-M4. The one thing I liked on the HP was the fact that I could plug it into the power source and the camera stayed on for eternity. Very useful for sitting and waiting for birds to appear at the feeders.
1/7/2004 5:27:02 PM
|
|
|
Tara L. Bennett
member since: 11/26/2003
|
Rating:
4.5
out of 5
I like the camera cause it came with other lenses for wide, far and close shots.
11/26/2003 11:29:23 AM
|
|
|
Lawrie D. Murray
member since: 10/28/2003
|
Rating:
2
out of 5
It was our first digital real nice to have around the house camera really captured nice colors but best prints 5x7 photos
10/30/2003 9:52:50 PM
|
|
|
Sandra S. Robinson
member since: 10/17/2003
|
Rating:
3.5
out of 5
I love this camera, it focuses on the subject no matter what is going on. Adjusting light, and etc. There is not anything that I don't like about the camera. I just wish I could afford a better or newer one.
10/17/2003 7:08:10 PM
|
|
|
Adriana S. Aspiazu
member since: 9/30/2003
|
Rating:
2
out of 5
You can defeat its auto-focus, but certain functions are limited. Its fun to play with the ACDSee program, but it is merely a primitive, soccermom camera that I could, as a teenager, afford.
9/30/2003 11:06:13 AM
|
|
|
Brian Donaldson
member since: 1/5/2003
|
Rating:
1
out of 5
This is a decent entry level digital camera but I have seen better ones
9/7/2003 4:21:48 PM
|
|
|
Jennifer overton
member since: 7/16/2003
|
Rating:
3
out of 5
This photo was taken during an argument the two subjects were having. I told them that I would snap a photo after counting to 5, and they should either hug or get photographed angry. They chose the anger. I looked at the photo and could see the tension in the pic, and knew it was good. I love it, but I am not the judge.
7/16/2003 10:20:25 PM
|
|
|
Susan C. Perry
member since: 6/8/2003
|
Rating:
3.5
out of 5
This being my first digital camera, learning has been fun. The close ups of animals and nature's landscapes are amazingly true in color and depth. However, I didn't know that long range shots were not as exciting. My camera has a two times zoom, but looks a bit digital.
7/16/2003 8:27:24 PM
|
|
|
Mal Mac Bride
member since: 5/17/2003
|
Rating:
4
out of 5
Very good Camera for a beginner to Digital Photography like myself.
6/17/2003 12:44:33 PM
|
|
|
