|
|
Robert Young
member since: 8/27/2004
|
Rating:
4.5
out of 5
Excellent color rendition. Very little noise.
6/10/2006 7:06:01 AM
|
|
|
Christian Johansson
member since: 6/9/2006
|
Rating:
3
out of 5
Old, few but good pixel, fast and a good house. Mostly for my sportphoto and as a backup.
6/9/2006 2:18:39 PM
|
|
|
John J. Molligo
member since: 12/29/2005
|
Rating:
3
out of 5
Used it for photojournalism and was adequate. I think there are better digital cameras available now. Prefer to originate on film.
12/29/2005 11:59:48 AM
|
|
|
Justin N. McGarry
member since: 12/12/2005
|
Rating:
4.5
out of 5
Awesome camera
12/12/2005 3:24:48 PM
|
|
|
Brian Gritt
member since: 4/13/2005
|
Rating:
4
out of 5
This thing is a tank. By today's standards, the 3mp sensor is obsolete but the speed and accuracy of this camera makes it a very useful tool for the right situations.
5/17/2005 5:05:45 AM
|
|
|
Karen Lund
member since: 9/15/2004
|
Rating:
4.5
out of 5
This camera is the very best for me! It takes excellent pictures and I am so pleased with it.
9/15/2004 1:12:50 PM
|
|
|
Nancy Barbata
member since: 7/19/2004
|
Rating:
4
out of 5
The Nikon D100 (31Dec03) brought me back to photography after too long a dry spell. The reviews on dpreview.com helped me decide which SLR I would purchase. I knew a little about digital photography, but found myself faced with a steep learning curve when I brought the new camera home. Without Thom Hogan's Complete Guide to the Nikon D100, I would still be lost. Over the last few months, as I studied Thom's book and other resources (books, Web sites, etc.) and just got out there to shoot lots of photos (practically unlimited in digital), I felt confusion give way to understanding, in part due to previous experience with a Nikon F (circa 1975). A strong background in photography made a big difference; I wouldn't recommend this camera for a beginner. The 28-200 zoom lens I chose for my first lens offers good flexibility, but on a recent trip to the Seguoia redwoods I realized that I will be looking into what my wide-angle options are soon. I think I would like to have the option of slower than 200 ISO. I still feel sluggish and forgetful about all the options and settings at my fingertips. I'm working on solidifying my workflow. All in all, I am thrilled with my camera and the photos I am making.
8/13/2004 8:06:49 AM
|
|
|
Rick Richardson
member since: 8/6/2001
|
Rating:
5
out of 5
Wonderful features. Love it. But since this is my first digital SLR I'm a little biased.
7/13/2004 7:45:55 PM
|
|
|
member since: 1/27/2004
|
Rating:
4
out of 5
My primary photographic interest is landscape and I find the D100 outstanding for that application. My only complaint is the slow flash sync speed and comparatively small image buffer when I shoot my son's sports activities.
2/25/2004 7:04:48 AM
|
|
|
Irving Heilweil
member since: 2/16/2004
|
Rating:
4.5
out of 5
THE DIH IS GREAT
2/16/2004 5:27:55 PM
|
|
|
Hugh Jervis
member since: 2/2/2004
|
Rating:
4
out of 5
I have no real complaints about the camera.Having previously used nikon eqiupment with a FM2 which I really liked and the quality is evident with my new D100.On the plus side the digital D100 has expanded my horizons and I feel much more willing to experiment. I have instant feedback and the cost and waiting period with film is negated.
A minor gripe is that on two occasions I have had the low pass filter cleaned as dust or ? was evident on my images. I take care when changing lenses and this may be a design flaw with digital SLR cameras.
2/2/2004 8:26:19 PM
|
|
|
