Still beautiful. Staff Favorite.

© Natasha Pliss

Still beautiful.  Staff Favorite.

Uploaded: December 31, 2013 20:23:30

Description

Category: DD. Taken inside by a window with the Canon 100 mm f/2.8 Macro lens. PS CS5. Texture. Nik Color Efex Pro. Topaz

Exif: F Number: 7.1, Exposure Bias Value: -1.67, ExposureTime: 1/200 seconds, Flash: did not fire, compulsory flash mode, ISO: 1600, White balance: Manual white balance, FocalLength: 100.00 mm, Model: Canon EOS 7D

Comments

Richard Lynch January 01, 2014

Natasha,

I like it. Minimalist, and texturally interesting.

As a viewer, I can see this being more dynamic and eye-grabbing, however. The message that even ruins/decay can be beautiful comes across more clearly (one of the reasons I am in Romania is exactly that...some of the most beautiful ruin here that I have ever seen...). I think I might have gone a little less heavy on the effect, enhanced the contrast, or masked the effect over the flower itself to let some of that color and contrast pour out.

I am betting you can do much more with the original than I can do with the example, as I can't just erase the effect, but have a look at the adjustment I made. I'd be interested in what you think.

Richard #1557857

Natasha Pliss level-classic January 02, 2014

Hi Richard,

Thank you very much for your valuable input. I thought about this image a lot before submitting it and wasn’t completely satisfied with the results. My message was: it’s subdued, quiet, moody, not full of life anymore but still beautiful in its hopelessness. But you are right: more contrast or light might give it much more interest. Your version looks a little too harsh to my taste but certainly very striking. Here is my new version.

Thank you.

Natasha

#10935632

Richard Lynch January 02, 2014

Natasha,

You have the distinct advantage of working from the original... I really think you improved this with the change. You didn't need to overwhelm with the contrast adjustment (I tend to go heavy on contrast generally -- my personal preference). I think you cleared up the subject enough, and the rest of the effect is still there.

By the way, that is the perfect way to receive feedback. Take it when you agree (at least to some extent), and apply what you agree with in your vision.

Nice job.

Richard #10935709


To discuss, first log in or sign up (buttons are at top center of page).

Get Constructive Critiques

Sign up for an interactive online photography course to get critiques on your photos.


 

Did You Know?

Discussions by Category: You can view photo discussions on various themes in the Community > Photo Discussions section of the site.

BetterPhoto Websites: If you see an orange website link directly under the photographer's name, it's totally okay. It's not spam. The reason: BetterPhoto is the one that offers these personal photography websites. We are supporting our clients with those links.

Unavailable EXIF: If there is no other information but 'Unavailable' in the EXIF (meaning no EXIF data exists with the photo), the 'Unavailable' blurb is not displayed. If there is any info, it shows. Many photos have the EXIF stripped out when people modify the image and resave it, before uploading.


 

The following truth is one of the core philosophies of BetterPhoto:

I hear, I forget.
I see, I remember.
I do, I understand.

You learn by doing. Take your next online photography class.

BetterPhoto.com Staff Favorite


Copyright for this photo belongs solely to Natasha Pliss.
Images may not be copied, downloaded, or used in any way without the expressed, written permission of the photographer. Contact photographer via gallery
Log in to follow or message this photographer or report this photo.