BetterPhoto Q&A
Category: New Answers

Photography Question 

Sean R. O'Connor
 

Getting a detailed shot of the moon


I am using a Nikon coolpix 4300 and I was wondering if it is possible to get a more detailed shot of the moon with my camera. I was taking pictures and all I could get was a glowing orb. It looked like there was alot of fog when I took the picture, when it actually was a very clear night. What I saw and what the picture captured were two completely different things. I'm not sure if the 4300 has the capability, but can anyone share their methods for capturing a sharper moon ? Maybe I can try to emulate them on my 4300... thanks!!

-sean


To love this question, log in above
January 12, 2004

 
- Gregory LaGrange

BetterPhoto Member
Contact Gregory LaGrange
Gregory LaGrange's Gallery
  You see the moon but the camera sees are dark sky. So you get a white dot. The halo was probably dust in the air, since it was over exposed it showed up on the film. (or the pictures since it's digital)
For shooting a moon, I think it's f/8 at 250 for asa100. I can't remember exactly, but it's somewhere around that, so you can start there and try different settings.


To love this comment, log in above
January 12, 2004

 

Sean R. O'Connor
  Thanks for the response Greg! I am new to photography, so I was wondering if you could clarify something. When you say 250, do you mean 1/250th second shutter speed? Thanks for your help again, is it much appreciated.

-sean


To love this comment, log in above
January 12, 2004

 
- Gregory LaGrange

BetterPhoto Member
Contact Gregory LaGrange
Gregory LaGrange's Gallery
  Yes, 1/250.


To love this comment, log in above
January 12, 2004

 

Bob Cammarata
  The moon, on a clear night, will respond favorably to the "Sunny 16" rule used in daylight.
At f16, use a shutter speed equal to the reciprical of your film speed..(or digital ISO setting), to record the detail and textures of the moon.

A speed too long will over-expose....rendering it as a bright white blotch against a dark sky...or elongate the shape to oblong, due to the rotation of the earth.


To love this comment, log in above
January 12, 2004

 
- Gregory LaGrange

BetterPhoto Member
Contact Gregory LaGrange
Gregory LaGrange's Gallery
  Actually to me it looks better to go a little over the f/16 rule. It looks a little dull to me if you stay with that rule. But that can be personal choice.


To love this comment, log in above
January 12, 2004

 

Sean R. O'Connor
  Thanks for all your help! I'll try to emulate those settings when I try next time.

-sean


To love this comment, log in above
January 13, 2004

 
This old forum is now archived. Use improved Forum here

Report this Thread