BetterPhoto Q&A
Category: New Answers

Photography Question 

Bernard
 

Nikon 50mm f1.8, or f1.4 for lowlight capture


I'm currently looking into purchasing the f1.8,or f1.4 for low light capture, I own a Sigma f2.8 17-50mm.
I realise the smaller f-stop number(f1.8) translates to a larger aperture opening, any guidance would greatly be appreciated. thanks in advance
Bernard


To love this question, log in above
February 03, 2008

 

Alan N. Marcus
  Hi Bernard,

You are asking for advice regarding which is better, f/1.4 vs.f/1.8. The f/1.8 is only just ½ f/stop slower, not much difference.

Likely the f/1.8 will be just a smidgen sharper at maximum aperture (this is not a certainty) only because the f/1.4 requires a steeper curve applied at the edges of its slightly larger diameter glass. i.e. the f/1/4 is harder to make. Likely this is a decision that will be made by your pocket book.

I have a Nikon 58mm f/1.4 and I love it.

Best of luck,
Alan Marcus, Anaheim, CA
ammarcus@earthlink.net


To love this comment, log in above
February 03, 2008

 

Bernard
  Thanks Alan
Your response on sharpness is very helpful relating to my future purchase. In regards to the 1/2 f/stop difference, in your opinion, would that make a large or small difference in Low light capture? weddings, banquets, ect..
Thank you


To love this comment, log in above
February 04, 2008

 
- Gregory LaGrange

BetterPhoto Member
Contact Gregory LaGrange
Gregory LaGrange's Gallery
  Actually, if the sigma is a constant 2.8, I would just use that.
Since it's such a short focal length. But 1/2 a stop is a small difference. If you're too blurry at 1.8, 1.4 isn't going to help much.


To love this comment, log in above
February 04, 2008

 

Jon Close
  The 2/3 stop difference between f/1.8 and f/1.4 may make the difference between blurry from camera or subject modtion (though depth of field will be shallower).

Suppose shooting w/o flash with the Sigma 18-50 f/2.8 and you're getting an exposure of f/2.8 and 1/15 second. At f/1.8 you could get 1/40 sec., while at f/1.4 you could shoot at 1/60.


To love this comment, log in above
February 04, 2008

 
- Gregory LaGrange

BetterPhoto Member
Contact Gregory LaGrange
Gregory LaGrange's Gallery
  But practically any place that has electricity has enough light for 2.8
Unless this is case of only wanting low iso.


To love this comment, log in above
February 04, 2008

 

Bernard
  Thanks Greg, Jon
The responses receive are really useful, at times I've managed a sharp image at 1/40 sec. but to be safe in this hopefully life time investment I'm going for the f/1.4, I'll be ready for next years NFL Rams championship after party.


To love this comment, log in above
February 04, 2008

 

Bernard
  Alan, Greg, Jon

I purchased the Nikon 50mm f/1.4, it is levels above the Sigma f/2.8,.


To love this comment, log in above
February 07, 2008

 
- Gregory LaGrange

BetterPhoto Member
Contact Gregory LaGrange
Gregory LaGrange's Gallery
  Whatever makes you happy.


To love this comment, log in above
February 07, 2008

 
This old forum is now archived. Use improved Forum here

Report this Thread