BetterPhoto Q&A
Category: New Answers

Photography Question 

Sharon Day
 

Diffusing filter vs Photoshop


 
 
A day or so ago there was a Q&A debate discussing the merits of a diffusion filter vs Photoshop. Since I have a diffusion filter to compliment my film camera system I thought I'd do a comparison. Here are the results. Can you tell the filter from the Photoshop edited image?


To love this question, log in above
August 12, 2005

 

Bobbie Davis
  I've spend the last 5 minutes or so looking at both photos and I can't tell the difference! I tried picking out certain areas to look at to see if there was a difference in the diffused look and my eyes can't see it at all.......


To love this comment, log in above
August 12, 2005

 

Karma Wilson
  That is truly incredible! I can't tell. I wonder if a soft focus lens would be different as compared to screw on and PS. Very interesting sharon!

Hey, for the record I ran a poll at the Fred Miranda Professional Wedding Photographers forum. I was curious what the most used soft focus methods were.

I gave these choices in the poll.

Soft focus screw on filter.
PS to create soft focus.
Soft focus lens.
None of the above, I don't go for that glamour crap.

The results are overwhelming for the PS at 75%. Main reason cited that it gives the photographer more control. The second runner up was the last choice, "I don't go for that glamour crap". LOL! It was at 12%. Third place was soft focus filter at 3%. Last place was soft focus lens--none as of yet. Apparently lots of professionals use PS, at least wedding shooters.

Karma


To love this comment, log in above
August 12, 2005

 

Karma Wilson
  Oops, my numbers were off:

PS 76%
Filter 6%
Lens 1%
None 14


To love this comment, log in above
August 12, 2005

 

Sharon Day
  I'm not surprised by those numbers, Karma. I enjoy both soft focus as well as sharpness on portraits.


To love this comment, log in above
August 12, 2005

 

Laura E. OConnor
  Sharon, that's amazing! By the way, if you want to post your comparison, the thread is at

http://www.betterphoto.com/forms/QnAdetail.php?threadID=17736

(sorry, wish I knew how to add a link, but I haven't figured it out, yet!)

I've kept out of it but have been reading the great debate. I think it'd be interesting to see the reactions over there.


To love this comment, log in above
August 12, 2005

 

Alisha L. Ekstrom
  Ok Sharon...that's incredible..I was reading that debate thread yesterday & I LOVE PHOTOSHOP!!!!! Anyhow you've proved your point. I'm with Laura though I just keep out of it, but really love reading what people say:):) I'll have to go see if you posted those images over there.


To love this comment, log in above
August 12, 2005

 

Diane Dupuis
  Wow - thanks for that Sharon! We can debate all you want but there's nothing like seeing the two pics right next to each other!
I for one would definitely want to have a sharp shot - and have the option to change it in PS rather than be stuck with only a soft shot...
Thanks again for making this so obvious!

PS: Laura - I think the other thread is maxed out - I'm sure most of the "debaters" will find this one though!


To love this comment, log in above
August 12, 2005

 

Sharon Day
  "PS: Laura - I think the other thread is maxed out."

I haven't tried to add anything to the last thread but I've heard from several it can not be added to.


To love this comment, log in above
August 12, 2005

 

Laura Clay-Ballard
  I"ve read both threads and my opinion is to start with a good photograph, bring it into photoshop (or whatever) and make it better, if you so desire. And, BTW, I also picked up a few photoshop tips and techniques that I will incorporate into my "people pictures" from reading the two threads (thank you very much.. LOL). I always wondered how to do that in photoshop. I, personally, do not particularly like the blurry look on most photographs (just my personal opinion and personal approach to photography). I prefer a sharp image. I've always prefered the "realism" of a photograph until I met photoshop cs! And, now, I LOVE incorporating various filters and effects .. THE FREE ONES! lol .. to use to enhance my images. I am a filter addict! I can't help it!
I, personally, would not choose to use a soft filter attachment for my camera(s). If I want soft then I will use photoshop. More control. More choices. And, it is all very subjective,now, isn't it? Thanks to all for your input on this. I sure learned a lot about soft focus!


To love this comment, log in above
August 12, 2005

 

Susana Ms Heide
  I read through yesterday's debate as well and think this puts a nice end to it :o) I can't see any difference on the soft focus in these two photos. They seem nearly identical. The only difference I spot is that Rose of Sharon 1 is a weeee bit brighter. Nicely done Sharon!


To love this comment, log in above
August 12, 2005

 
This old forum is now archived. Use improved Forum here

Report this Thread