BetterPhoto Q&A
Category: New Answers

Photography Question 

Alex Cabrall
 

Canon FD lenes: Old vs. New.


I'd like to hear what people have to say about older "breechlock" FD lenses. I currently have such a lens, a 50mm f/1.8. The breechlock makes changing lenes a pain, sure, but I seem to be getting pretty decent images. Would I see an increase in sharpness if I purchased a "new" (I hear they were called FDn breifly) 50mm f/1.4 "Bayonet" lens in good condition from my local Wolf Camera? Because the prices on these lenses are relatively low, I'd assume buying another F/1.8 over an F/1.4 would be foolish, as 1.4's tend to be built better. What about Aspherical Elements? Would my older lens lack one? I know it's a rather vague question, But any feedback would be greatly accepted. Thank you.


To love this question, log in above
September 24, 2004

 

Jon Close
  With respect to breech-lock and "New FD", There is no difference in lens quality or sharpness. Only a simplified mounting procedure.

The f/1.4 is 2/3 stops faster, has better build, slightly closer focusing (0.5m v. 0.6m), and more aperture diaphram blades (8 v. 5 or 6) giving more rounded aperture shape for better "bokeh" (nice creamy out-of-focus background).

Neither lens has an aspheric element. Aspherics are generally not helpful for 50mm, expcept for really wide aperture models like f/1.2 or f/1.0. More often these are found in wide angle zooms. The f/1.4 is marginally better corrected than the f/1.8 with 8 elements instead of 6, though the f/1.8 is very sharp in its own right.


To love this comment, log in above
September 25, 2004

 

doug Nelson
  It seems that makers tend to improve lenses with new models, but would you see a difference between a breech-lock 1.8 and the same series 1.4? Maybe, as John says, the out-of-focus blur would be smoother. Between the breech-lock 1.4 SSC and the 1.4 FDn? You'd have to enlarge to poster size, and even then, any difference may be undetectable. Also, the old FD 58-filter size 1.2's are as sharp as any from f4 on and have a delightful softness from wide open to f2.8.
The old FD 24 f2.8, 28 f2, 50mm f 1.4, and 35 f2 (chrome filter ring version) are all highly regarded oldies.


To love this comment, log in above
September 27, 2004

 
This old forum is now archived. Use improved Forum here

Report this Thread